How Can Variational Calculus Help Optimize Bullet Design?

avocadogirl
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
AAAAHHH! Calculus of Variations

Homework Statement



See attached

This is a project for an upper level math methods of physics course. My background is insufficient and ultimately, I don't know what is going on, AT ALL. The work I've provided is the product of the collective efforts of my partner, myself and, our supervising professor. I can follow the argument the professor has made but, I could not have made that argument myself.

My partner is exhausted and, I just need some direction with the variational calculus in solving the form we derived for the Euler-Lagrange equation.

Homework Equations



Euler-Lagrange eqution

The Attempt at a Solution



See attached. Thank you all, very, very much.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


I would love to take a look but unfortunately I don't have MS Word on this computer and due to its sensitivity to viruses I prefer not opening your document at all.
Can you make a PDF document (there are many Word-to-PDF printers) or image out of it, if that is possible?
 


CompuChip said:
Can you make a PDF document (there are many Word-to-PDF printers) or image out of it, if that is possible?

Ta-da... I'm far too kind!
 


I would think that if the length of the bullet was only twice the distance of the max radius, your bullet could only be long and "slender" to an extent but, is there any way in which you could put the radius in terms of the change of the function defining the contour of the bullet? Could you define the radius in terms of the slope of the function? And, if we define the x-axis to be the axis of symmetry, could we define the constants which would determine the position of the function?

From that, given the restrictions of the length being twice the max radius, could we use variational calculus to determine a minimal change in the function? Because, as I see it, if the surface of contact between the bullet and the air particles is almost ( as close as you can get it ) horizontal, that's going to provide the minimal kinetic energy loss, like the way modern rifle bullets are designed.

Thank you both.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top