How can you make the substitution s = rθ when θ changes with every element?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the substitution s = rθ in the context of calculating the electric field from a semicircular rod. The main concern is how to apply this substitution when θ varies with each element, particularly when integrating over the rod. It is clarified that while θ changes, it does not lead to overlapping segments when summing infinitesimal contributions. The strategy involves breaking down the segments into finite parts and then transitioning to an infinite number of segments, allowing for integration without overlap. The conclusion emphasizes that the relationship between s and θ remains valid throughout the process.
oneplusone
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
When doing problems such as finding the electric field of an object, my book often makes substations like: ## dq = \lambda dr = \lambda d\theta\cdot r## (this is in reference to finding the electric field at the center of a rod shaped in a semicircle). See attached for full solution to this.

My question is, how can you let ##\theta## be the angle from the vertical and still make the ## s = r\theta## substitution?? Wouldn't that give you the length of the semicircle starting from the top, to the angle where you direct it to?
Rephrasing: Wouldn't theta change with every element dx?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-02-23 at 11.17.32 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-02-23 at 11.17.32 AM.png
    16 KB · Views: 464
Physics news on Phys.org
oneplusone said:
(this is in reference to finding the electric field at the center of a rod shaped in a semicircle). See attached for full solution to this.

It looks like the rod is hollow. The problem with interpreting the full solution is that you haven't given the full statement of the problem and defined what the various variables mean.

Wouldn't that give you the length of the semicircle starting from the top, to the angle where you direct it to?

I think it would.

s = r \theta and the solution uses ds = r d \theta. There is no assumption that \theta is constant wtih respect to the x coordinate of end of the radius.
 
oneplusone said:
how can you let ##\theta## be the angle from the vertical and still make the ## s = r\theta## substitution??
I don't understand your concern. Θ is s/r by definition, so you can always make that substitution.
 
But if you're summing up the whole segment, using tiny bits of dx at a time, how do you just get dx?
I understand ##s=r\theta##, but wouldn't ##\theta## get really large eventually and overlap previously summed up segments? Sorry it's very confusing to explain
 
I don't see dx anywhere in those equations so I am not sure what you are talking about.

Are you perhaps asking a general question about how integration works by summing up an infinite number of infinitesimal segments?
 
Yes, that is what I'm asking. I understand that, but how do you sum up all of the dx segments using s=r*theta? What is the strategy?
 
Since s = r θ we can take differences of both sides and get Δs = r Δθ. So, for example, if you would break s up into a finite number of non-overlapping segments and sum them up ##\Sigma \; f \; \Delta s## then that is exactly the same as breaking θ up into the same finite number of segments ##\Sigma \; f \; r\Delta \theta##. Then simply change that finite number of segments into an infinite number of segments and you have ##\int f \; r \; d\theta##. There is no overlapping in s and therefore no overlapping in θ.
 
Back
Top