How Do Controlled Sources Impact Thevenin Equivalent Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
Controlled sources significantly impact Thevenin equivalent calculations, as they alter the voltage and current characteristics observed from the output terminals. When analyzing circuits with controlled sources, it's essential to account for their effects rather than simply suppressing them to find Thevenin resistance. A common approach involves attaching a test source to the output and using Ohm's law to determine the current and voltage, which can then be used to calculate resistance. Nodal analysis can also be employed by introducing a load resistance and deriving an expression for the output voltage. This method allows for the identification of Thevenin voltage and resistance through manipulation of the voltage divider equation.
Frankenstein19
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First I found the equivalent resistance since the 3 ohm resistor and 6 ohm resistor are in series. 9ohm. Then I did chose the node where the arrow points to as Voc, which is also va.

KVL:
(va+24V)/9ohm=1.33va
I get va to be 2.18

Then looking for Isc, I close the output terminals and then do kcl again on the node on top of the voltage controlled current source

1.33va-isc-24V/9ohm=0

and get isc=0.23

so Rt=2.18/0.23=9.47

The book says

isc=.24 and Rt=-3

I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png
    upload_2017-12-11_15-51-25.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 815
Physics news on Phys.org
Frankenstein19 said:
Then I did chose the node where the arrow points to as Voc, which is also va.

That doesn't look right to me. From your picture, it looks like ##V_a## is between the resistors, not at the node above the dependent source.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and Frankenstein19
Drakkith said:
That doesn't look right to me. From your picture, it looks like ##V_a## is between the resistors, not at the node above the dependent source.
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
 
Frankenstein19 said:
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
It helps if you sound out what your equations are saying. For instance, your first eqn says that the current through the 3Ω plus the current through the 6Ω is equal to the current from the dependent source. Is that what you intend?

direction is consistently clockwise
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
Frankenstein19 said:
Yikes. ok so if i apply kcl on va i between the resistors i'd have:

(va+24)/3ohm + (voc-va)/6ohm=1.33va

since i have 2 variables i need 2 eq and doing kcl on voc:

(voc-va)/6ohm -24V/9ohm= 1.33va

I get that va is 2.29 and voc is 36.58
Like @NascentOxygen said, look at how many different currents you should have in that one loop.
 
Frankenstein19 said:
First I found the equivalent resistance since the 3 ohm resistor and 6 ohm resistor are in series. 9ohm.
Beware! When you have controlled sources like the ##1.33 v_a## source in the network, the effective Thevenin resistance will very likely not be simply a function of the network resistors! The controlled source will actively alter the V vs I characteristics that are "seen" from the output terminals. You cannot simply suppress controlled sources to find the Thevenin resistance. You need to take its effects into account.

A typical way to approach such problems is to attach a "test" source to the output and then analyze the circuit to find the current and voltage at the output, and hence by Ohm's law, the resistance. There are other methods, too. One that I favor involves assuming that there is some load resistance ##R_L## connected to the output, then using nodal analysis to find the voltage across that load resistor. This will yield an expression involving ##R_L##. Since a Thevenin source driving a load resistance is a classic voltage divider circuit, the expression that you find for the output voltage can be manipulated to the form of the standard voltage divider equation, and the Thevenin voltage and Thevenin resistance can be picked out of that equation by inspection :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top