How do I calculate the tension in cable 1 without using the tension in cable 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ijd5000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the tension T1 in cable 1 without relying on T2, two equations based on the forces in the x and y directions are established. By expressing T1 and T2 in terms of their angles with the ceiling, the equations can be manipulated to eliminate T2. This leads to a relationship where T1 is expressed solely in terms of m, θ1, θ2, and g. The final equation allows for T1 to be solved independently, demonstrating that combining equations from different directions is permissible for this purpose. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding vector components in tension calculations.
ijd5000
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A chandelier with mass m is attached to the ceiling of a large concert hall by two cables. Because the ceiling is covered with intricate architectural decorations (not indicated in the figure, which uses a humbler depiction), the workers who hung the chandelier couldn't attach the cables to the ceiling directly above the chandelier. Instead, they attached the cables to the ceiling near the walls. Cable 1 has tension T1 and makes an angle of θ1 with the ceiling. Cable 2 has tension T2 and makes an angle of θ2 with the ceiling.

Find an expression for T1, the tension in cable 1, that does not depend on T2.
Express your answer in terms of some or all of the variables m, θ1, and θ2, as well as the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity g.


i have for my Forces:

F(x) T2 cos ( θ2)-T1cos(θ1)=0
F(y) T2 sin(θ2)+T1 sin(θ1)-gm=0

not sure how to describe T1 without using T2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
These are two equations in two unknowns, T_1 and T_2.
If you write them as
T_1cos(v_1)=T_2cos(v_2)
T_1sin(v_1)-mg=-T_2sin(v_2)
then dividing the one equation with the other yields:
\frac{T_{1}\sin\theta_{1}-mg}{T_{1}\cos\theta_{1}}=-\tan\theta_{2}

Hurray, T_2 has disappeared! :smile:
Now, rearrange the last equation, so as to solve for T_1
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
arildno said:
These are two equations in two unknowns, T_1 and T_2.
If you write them as
T_1cos(v_1)=T_2cos(v_2)
T_1sin(v_1)-mg=-T_2sin(v_2)
then dividing the one equation with the other yields:
\frac{T_{1}\sin\theta_{1}-mg}{T_{1}\cos\theta_{1}}=-\tan\theta_{2}

Hurray, T_2 has disappeared! :smile:
Now, rearrange the last equation, so as to solve for T_1

It's ok to combine equations from different directions? I thought you have to keep x and y separate until you add the vectors.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top