How do I change this integral limit from x to t?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on changing integral limits in the context of deriving the kinetic energy formula, specifically from "x" to "t". It clarifies that the correct limits should be from "x" to "v_f" for the upper limit and from "0" to "v_i" for the lower limit. The participants emphasize that velocity "v" cannot be factored out of the integral due to its dependence on displacement "x". The correct formulation involves using a different variable for integration, denoted as "x'", to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and variable substitution
  • Familiarity with the concepts of kinetic energy and work-energy principle
  • Knowledge of the relationship between velocity and displacement
  • Basic proficiency in handling limits of integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the kinetic energy formula in detail
  • Learn about variable substitution techniques in integral calculus
  • Explore the work-energy theorem and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the implications of variable dependencies in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, educators teaching calculus and mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of integral calculus in physical applications.

PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
Homework Statement
How do I change the integral limit from x to t.
Relevant Equations
I've included the equations in main posting. Thanks.
Hi,

It's not a homework problem. I was just doing it and couldn't find a way to change the integral limit from "x" to "t". I should end up with kinetic energy formula, (1/2)mv^2. I've assumed that what I've done is correct. Thank you!

1627697860496.png


Edit:
"E" is work done.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the very last step of your derivation, where you change the variable of integration from ##dx## to ##dv## the integral limit has to change but not from ##x## to ##t## but from ##x ## to ##v_f## that is the final velocity. Also the lower limit has to change from## 0## to ##v_i## that is the initial velocity.

P.S the two last steps where you pull out ##v## out of the integral, is not a correct thing to do. Velocity ##v## is a function of time and displacement ##x## is also a function of time, so there is an implicit equation between v and x, that is essentially velocity v is a function of distance x that is ##v=v(x)## so it just can't be taken out of the integral.

To see this more clearly, take the case where the force F is constant, hence we have constant acceleration ##a## and the velocity ##v(t)=at## (assuming zero initial velocity). But it is also $$x(t)=\frac{1}{2}at^2\Rightarrow t=\sqrt{\frac{2x}{a}}$$ and thus replacing this t in the first equation we get $$v(x)=a\sqrt{\frac{2x}{a}}=\sqrt{2ax}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PainterGuy
You have two problems.

First you can't write ##\int_0^x F\,dx##. It doesn't mean anything, because you are using the same symbol for integration variable and limit.
So instead, use ##x'## as your integration variable: ##\int_0^x F\,dx'##.

Secondly, you can't move ##v## outside the integral as you do in the 2nd last step, because it changes with the integration variable ##x'##.

The development you want is:

$$
m\int_0^x \frac{dv}{dt}dx'
=m\int_{x'=0}^{x'=x} \frac{dx'}{dt}dv
=m\int_{v=v_0}^{v=v_x} v\,dv
$$
where ##v_0,v_x## are the velocities at locations 0 and ##x##.

The integration is then straightforward.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PainterGuy

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K