How do I combine equations for absolute independent motion with pulleys?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on combining equations related to pulleys and independent motion. The user has derived several equations but struggles with how to combine them effectively. A suggestion is made to eliminate variables S_c and S_d by manipulating the equations, such as multiplying and adding them. It is emphasized that the lengths of l_1, l_2, and l_3 do not have absolute values, and understanding velocity and force ratios is crucial. The conversation concludes with advice on labeling forces to simplify the problem-solving process.
JustDerek
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been given a problem with pulleys which I have attached to this post. I've derived the equations shown in the post but I'll also write them below. What I'm struggling with is how to combine them.

Homework Equations


##l_1=S_a+2S_c##
##l_2=S_d+(S_d-S_c)##
##l_3=S_e+(S_e-S_c)##

In a similar example I've been given but with less pulleys it shows :
##l_1+l_2=S_a+4S_d##
This is the part I don't get. I don't get how the two equations combine to become that and I'm sure if I can understand that I can finish the rest.

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMAG0598.jpg
    IMAG0598.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 475
Physics news on Phys.org
You can add the equations in any way you want. Something that gets rid of S_c and S_d is probably useful.

As an example, you have "+2 S_c" in the first equation and "-S_c" in the second one. You can multiply the second equation (both sides!) with two, then add the two equations.
 
I'm not sure why you are trying to find ##l_1, l_2\ and\ l_3##. There is no absolute value for them. Changing the length of any of them does not affect the velocity ratio nor the forces.
What I think you need to know are the velocity ratios and the force ratios, which you should be able to do by inspection in a simple example like this.
I would suggest the way to deal with the forces is to label one of them F or whatever, then write the others as multiples (or fractions.)
 
Managed to get there myself eventually but thanks for the intended help
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top