How do I combine equations for absolute independent motion with pulleys?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on combining equations related to pulleys and independent motion. The user has derived several equations but struggles with how to combine them effectively. A suggestion is made to eliminate variables S_c and S_d by manipulating the equations, such as multiplying and adding them. It is emphasized that the lengths of l_1, l_2, and l_3 do not have absolute values, and understanding velocity and force ratios is crucial. The conversation concludes with advice on labeling forces to simplify the problem-solving process.
JustDerek
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been given a problem with pulleys which I have attached to this post. I've derived the equations shown in the post but I'll also write them below. What I'm struggling with is how to combine them.

Homework Equations


##l_1=S_a+2S_c##
##l_2=S_d+(S_d-S_c)##
##l_3=S_e+(S_e-S_c)##

In a similar example I've been given but with less pulleys it shows :
##l_1+l_2=S_a+4S_d##
This is the part I don't get. I don't get how the two equations combine to become that and I'm sure if I can understand that I can finish the rest.

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMAG0598.jpg
    IMAG0598.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
You can add the equations in any way you want. Something that gets rid of S_c and S_d is probably useful.

As an example, you have "+2 S_c" in the first equation and "-S_c" in the second one. You can multiply the second equation (both sides!) with two, then add the two equations.
 
I'm not sure why you are trying to find ##l_1, l_2\ and\ l_3##. There is no absolute value for them. Changing the length of any of them does not affect the velocity ratio nor the forces.
What I think you need to know are the velocity ratios and the force ratios, which you should be able to do by inspection in a simple example like this.
I would suggest the way to deal with the forces is to label one of them F or whatever, then write the others as multiples (or fractions.)
 
Managed to get there myself eventually but thanks for the intended help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top