How do I design a PI controller with unity DC gain?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around designing a PI controller with unity DC gain, where the user struggles to understand the relationship between the controller parameters and the system's transfer function. The key equation derived from the solution, (G(0)/(1+Kp*G(0))=1, is questioned for its origin and relevance to the unity gain condition. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly placing the controller in the feedback loop and using approximations to simplify the analysis. Additionally, the user expresses frustration over insufficient explanations in the textbook regarding these concepts. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding controller design principles and their application in feedback systems.
glorimda
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm doing my homework, and encountered a problem.

1.jpg


The problem is the one as attached. It includes a part of solution that I don't understand.

I've known that when designing the PI controller, we start from D(s) = (Kp + Ki/S)

The condition of the PI controller is, firstly, unity DC gain.

So the way I started is setting D(0) = 1, but couldn't proceed anymore because there is 1/s

in D(s), also it is obviously different from the solution.

The second way was setting whole transfer function of the system Gcl(0) = 1,

but couldn't find the right solution.

According to solution, it approaches Kp and Ki separately.

And it uses (G(0)/(1+Kp*G(0))=1), but I can't understand this.

Could somebody help me out??
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The secret is in the fact that there is a pole @ s=0 in the plant. When you apply the feedback controller, You'll have H(s) = \frac{G_c(s)G(s)}{1 + G_c(s)G(s)} where G_c(s) is the controller.

You start with the criterion they gave you \frac{G(0)}{1 + K_pG(0)} = 1. In order to use this, you first have to plug in G(s). Notice, that of course, if we then set s=0, that the expression blows up, so instead we have to do the Laplace domain equivalent of L'Hopital's rule, which is multiplying the expression by a fancy form of one, or \frac{s}{s}. Assigning {\hat{G}}(s) = \frac{210}{(5s+7)(s+3)}, then you'll have \frac{{\hat{G}}(s)}{s + K_p{\hat{G}}(s)}. Notice now that if you plug in 0, the expression simplifies to \frac{21}{K_p21} which, set equal to one, produces the result that K_p=1.

Unfortunately, I remember less about the phase margin controller design. Maybe I'll brush up and get back to you (I love reviewing. I seriously might.). But I will say this... The design centers around starting with the bode plot for G(s). Since the new plant will be Gc(s)G(s), the phases will add, and you have to cancel out the unwanted phase in the plant with the controller. It's also standard to add in 5 degrees of safety within the design procedure since it's known that this procedure involves some, perhaps strong, approximation. This is vague and I'm sorry I don't have more details. But I hope this helps get you started...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for reply.
In fact, I'm still unclear about the part (G(0)/(1+Kp*G(0))=1) which is from the solution.
In the problem, they just gave me the condition that 'PI controller with a unity dc gain'
and in the solution, the equation '(G(0)/(1+Kp*G(0))=1)' just came up. The equation is not from the problem, but from solution. What I wondered was how to induce
'PI controller with a unity dc gain' ----> (G(0)/(1+Kp*G(0))=1)
The rest of the part you explained, I got it, but not this part.
I hope that you understood my question. ^^!
 
Ohhhhhh I see what you're saying. Honestly I don't know. It seems like the textbook is asking you to take more approximations than necessary, and not giving you some of the information. It depends. Where is the controller assumed to be placed in the loop? Between the E(s) signal and the G(s) plant or in the Feedback Loop on Y(s)? The way the problem is posed makes it look like it's in the feedback loop on Y(s). That may yield something.
 
I guess the controller is supposed to be placed between E(s) and plant G(s), because in the problem I attached, it says 'unity feedback' which means H(s) = 1.

All I got is identical to the one I attached.

I'm many times bothered due to lack of explanation and sources regarding exercises in

the textbook. >.<
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top