How Do I Find Direction of Forces in Statics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Antunovic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the direction of forces in statics involves recognizing that the indicated directions can be arbitrary, often representing compressive forces in rods. To determine the actual forces, one must apply the equations of statics, ensuring consistency in defining positive and negative directions. It’s essential to analyze the system's equilibrium, considering that forces may be in tension or compression based on the setup. If the problem doesn't specify direction, you can make an arbitrary choice, but it must be consistently applied throughout calculations. Ultimately, clarity in defining directions will lead to accurate results in determining force magnitudes and their orientations.
Ivan Antunovic
Messages
109
Reaction score
4
I really don't understand what is the logic in the direction of forces S1,S2 and S3.This is an example and here are given directions of the forces,but in the exam I will have to find them on my own.
Could someone explain to me how should I find them and what kind of thinking I have to apply here,maybe action equals minus reaction ?
I really have a bad professor from Mechanics and she just doesn't care to explain very much.

Thank you in advance I hope pictures are clear.
 

Attachments

  • statika 2.jpg
    statika 2.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 327
  • DSC_0629.JPG
    DSC_0629.JPG
    24.6 KB · Views: 369
Physics news on Phys.org
The last picture...don't know why it wasnt uploaded in the first post
 
Ivan Antunovic said:
The last picture...don't know why it wasnt uploaded in the first post
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0628.JPG
    DSC_0628.JPG
    15.7 KB · Views: 327
Ivan Antunovic said:
I really don't understand what is the logic in the direction of forces S1,S2 and S3.This is an example and here are given directions of the forces,but in the exam I will have to find them on my own.
Could someone explain to me how should I find them and what kind of thinking I have to apply here,maybe action equals minus reaction ?
I really have a bad professor from Mechanics and she just doesn't care to explain very much.

Thank you in advance I hope pictures are clear.
I think the direction of the forces as shown on the diagram is arbitrary. You can assume that the direction indicates, for example, a compressive force in each rod.

After you work out the forces in each rod which keep this system in statics equilibrium, there may indeed be forces which are in tension, that is, which will tend to pull a rod out of the wall.

It's hard to figure out what is the true case here just by inspection. The rods appear to be symmetrical with respect to the y-axis.

As always, use the equations of statics to find the unknown force magnitudes in each of the three rods.
 
In general if a problem statement doesn't define which direction is +ve then you have to do so. You can make an arbitrary choice but you must be consistent. eg you have to take that into account when you are writing your equations (eg when summing components of forces or torques). The answer force(s) or torque(s) will turn out to be +ve or -ve then you refer to your definition of +ve to work out which direction it points and calculate any angles appropriately.
 
CWatters said:
In general if a problem statement doesn't define which direction is +ve then you have to do so. You can make an arbitrary choice but you must be consistent. eg you have to take that into account when you are writing your equations (eg when summing components of forces or torques). The answer force(s) or torque(s) will turn out to be +ve or -ve then you refer to your definition of +ve to work out which direction it points and calculate any angles appropriately.

So I could basically take directions as I've taken on this picture and it should be fine?
 

Attachments

  • statika 2 - Copy.jpg
    statika 2 - Copy.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 355
  • DSC_0630.JPG
    DSC_0630.JPG
    29 KB · Views: 308
  • DSC_0631.JPG
    DSC_0631.JPG
    33.6 KB · Views: 340
Sorry for the 2nd picture being reverse uploaded tried to upload it again normally but failed.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0630.JPG
    DSC_0630.JPG
    29 KB · Views: 339
Back
Top