Ruby_338
- 27
- 2
How come ##adiabatic \,work = C_v(T_2 -T_1)##
The discussion revolves around finding the work done in an adiabatic process, exploring the relationship between internal energy, work, and temperature changes in the context of thermodynamics. The participants engage with theoretical aspects and mathematical formulations related to the second law of thermodynamics.
The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the derivation of the work done in an adiabatic process, with multiple viewpoints on the formulation and the inclusion of variables. Participants express differing levels of understanding and clarity regarding the equations involved.
There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of variables and the conditions under which the equations apply. The discussion does not provide a complete derivation of the equations mentioned.
Maybe he means "per mole" or "per unit mass.". Also, irrespective of the 2nd law, Q is equal to zero for an adiabatic process.Ssnow said:If the transformation is adiabatic you have that ##\Delta U=-W## for the second law of thermodynamics because ##Q=0##. So ##W=-\Delta U = n\cdot C_{v}(T_{1} -T_{2})## where ## C_{v}## is the specific heat for constant volume and ##n## represents the mole. It is strange that in your formula there isn't ##n##...
Ssnow