How do I isolate S in this Matrix and Vector Equation?

chepa
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I would need to isolate S (solve for S knowing all other terms) in this equation made of Matrix (B, I and S), of vector (x and y) and of constant &.

x = - ([(B-I)S -(I/&)]^-1) (y/&)

Someone could help me?

Chepa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's call "c" your constant "&":

x=-((B-I)S-\frac{I}{c})^{-1}\frac{y}{c}

Then

((B-I)S-\frac{I}{c})x=-((B-I)S-\frac{I}{c})((B-I)S-\frac{I}{c})^{-1}\frac{y}{c}=-\frac{y}{c}

(B-I)Sx-\frac{I}{c}x=-\frac{y}{c}
(B-I)Sx=-\frac{y}{c}-\frac{I}{c}x
Sx=(B-I)^{-1}(-\frac{y}{c}-\frac{I}{c}x)

Since x is a vector, this is a system of equations. As far as I remember, the existence of an "inverse vector" that satisfies the equation is not guaranteed, so you cannot simply solve for S. What you can do is solve the system and find the elements of S. Notice that S is a matrix whereas x is a vector. This gives you n equations for n^2 elements of S, which means that there is a family of matrices that satisfy that equation. If you assume e.g. that all elements of S except for the diagonal are 0, then you might find an answer.
 
Hi meldraft,
actually the matrix S is a diagonal matrix and all other parameters of that equations are known. That being said, my "matrix solving skills" are rather deficient. That would be great if you could tell me a little more on the method or the way I should put things in place to solve this.

Thanks a lot anyway,

Chepa
 
If S is diagonal, the product Sx is the vector
$$\begin{bmatrix} S_{11}x_1 \\ S_{22}x_2 \\ \cdots \\ S_{nn}x_n \end{bmatrix}$$

So if work out the right hand side of post #2 and call it vector z, you have the equations
$$\begin{align} S_{11}x_1 &= z_1 \\ S_{22}x_2 &= z_2 \\ \cdots & \cdots \\ S_{nn}x_n &= z_n \end{align}$$ which are easy to solve, if the solution exists. If you have ##x_i = 0## and the corresponding ##z_i \ne 0## for some value(s) of ##i##, there isn't a solution. If ##x_i = z_i = 0##, the corresponding ##S_{ii}## is arbitrary.
 
Thanks
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top