How Do I Solve This Rotational Motion Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a rotational motion problem, with the original poster seeking assistance. They provided images of the problem and their initial attempt at a solution, questioning the validity of using tan37° in their calculations. Participants suggested recalculating the moment around points A or B and emphasized the need to consider all acting forces. Ultimately, the original poster resolved the issue by recognizing their oversight in accounting for all forces involved. The problem was successfully clarified, leading to a solution.
coldblood
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
Please help me in solving this problem, I'll appreciate the help.

The problem is as:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/q71/s720x720/1390659_1461728134054292_1386292618_n.jpg


Attempt -

https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/q84/s720x720/1525033_1461728557387583_1961156759_n.jpg


Thank you all in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to calculate moment around point A or B. I don't think your equation tan37° is valid.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    26.9 KB · Views: 415
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mishek said:
Try to calculate moment around point A or B. I don't think your equation tan37° is valid.

Thanks dear, I got the answer. I was making the last equation in the wrong manner. I was only considering N1 ans N2 and forgot about the other forces which are acting there.
 
The problem has been cleared.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Do You Solve This Rotational Motion Problem?
Replies
13
Views
3K
What is the Solution to this Rotational Motion Problem?
Replies
7
Views
2K
How Do I Solve This Rotational Motion Problem?
Replies
2
Views
1K
How to Solve This Rotational Motion Problem?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Rotational Motion: Solving a Problem with Translational and Angular Motion
Replies
11
Views
2K
What is the Solution to a Rotational Motion Problem?
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is the Moment of Inertia for a Rod?
Replies
5
Views
1K
How Can Vector Analysis Improve Understanding of Mechanics Problems?
Replies
34
Views
4K
How Do You Solve This Rotational Motion Problem?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Understanding Friction in Rotational Motion: Solving a Common Misconception
Replies
26
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top