How Do Relative Velocity and Relative Path Differ?

AI Thread Summary
Relative velocity is defined as the velocity of one object as observed from another moving object, requiring a reference frame for accurate measurement. It is calculated by subtracting the velocity of the reference frame from the velocity of the object in question. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the inclusion of relative velocity in mathematics curricula, as it is primarily a physics concept. Additionally, relative path refers to the trajectory of an object in relation to another object or reference frame. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing motion in multiple reference systems.
DeathKnight
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
What is relative velocity? I have solved a lot of questions relating to it but I'm still confused what EXACTLY is it? Its in my maths book so my mathematics teacher was not able describe this in detail. One more thing: I'll be much pleased if someone also explains what is relative path.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Abdullah.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what "relative velocity",which is a physics concept,has to do with math books,but i'll try to give an explanation.
Velocity is defined as the varition of coordinate wrt to time.Coordinate is defined wrt to a reference system which is composed by a point in space (considered fix) and a system of coordinate axis.In a 3D space,there are 3 independent axis,which are usually chosen as the Ox,Oy and Oz axis.Suppose that this reference system is labeled with "1".That is,a point (a body) wrt to this reference system has the coordinate:x_{1}(t).I chosed it unidimensional for the simplicity of the exposure.Chose another reference system.Another point and another coordinate.Label it with "2".Then the same body has in this reference system the coordinate x_{2}(t).The velocities for the 2 systems are v_{1}(t) and v_{2}(t).Assume that one reference system is fix (the one with the label "1") and the one with the label "2" is moving with the speed v wrt to the system "1" which,as i said,i assumed fix.Then the RELATIVE VELOCITY OF THE BODY wrt to the moving frame is
v_{2}=v_{1}-v

The concept of relative velocity appears whenever you're dealing with more than one reference system.U must know that the concept of "velocity" requires a reference system.When there's one moving body,but more reference systems,then u can define the "relative velocity".


Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
I don't know what "relative velocity",which is a physics concept,has to do with math books,


Daniel.
I feel the same way man. Its not actually in my maths book its in my addition Mathematics book(o'levels). They even had particle machanics in it with work energy power. I had the option to choose biology or Additional mathematics and I chose Additional Maths.
By the way that's for replying.

:approve:
 
Last edited:
At dictionary.com
Relative Velocity - the velocity with which a body approaches or recedes from another body, whether both are moving or only one.

If this is not clear try looking it up in an advance physics glossary.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top