How Do Surface Plasmons Behave at a Metal Interface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elfrae
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interface
Elfrae
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the plane interface z=0 between metal 1 at z>0 and metal 2 at z<0. Metal 1 has bulk plasmon frequency \omega_{p1}; metal 2 has \omega_{p2}. The dielectric constants in both metals are those of electron gases. Show that surface plasmons associated with the interface have the frequency \omega = (\frac{1}{2}(\omega_{p1}^{2} + \omega_{p2}^{2}))^{\frac{1}{2}}


Homework Equations



I have these, but I'm not sure whether they're relevant:

\epsilon(\omega) = 1 - \frac{\omega_{p}^{2}}{\omega^{2}}

\omega_{s}^{2} = \frac{1}{2}\omega_{p}^{2}


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know how to begin this question. A pointer on what I need to think about would be appreciated. Thanks.

Edit: I've tried equating the surface plasmon frequency for each metal, but I'm not getting anywhere. I'm not sure if I'm going in the right direction with that.
Some of my previous questions were to do with components of the electric field being continuous at the boundary. Is that likely to be what I need to use?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I've solved this now. I'm just not sure about one of the steps I used to get to the answer.

I assumed that the normal component of the electric displacement D is continuous at the boundary, and hence

\epsilon_{1} = - \epsilon_{2}

Bearing in mind that the boundary is between two metals, is this correct?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top