How Do You Approach Angular Momentum Operator Algebra in Quantum Mechanics?

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2015-4-12_18-18-23.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


This whole thing about angular momentum has me totally confused and stumped, but I am trying this problem given in a youtube video lecture I watched.

I know of this equation
##L^{2} = L_{\pm}L_{\mp} + L_{z}^{2} \mp \hbar L_{z}##
##L^{2}f = \lambda f##
##L_{z}f = \mu f##

In the case ##L^{2}f = 2 \hbar^{2}f##, the eigenvalue ##\lambda = 2 \hbar^{2}##

So I expand
$$L^{2}f = (L_{-}L_{+} + L_{z}^{2} + \hbar L_{z})f$$
But, I don't know what ##L_{z}## should be. Also, how do I know if I should pick ##L_{-}L_{+}## or ##L_{+}L_{-}##?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-4-11_20-10-8.png
    upload_2015-4-11_20-10-8.png
    18 KB · Views: 474
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a little puzzled by the examples, because normally L^2 has eigenvalues \hbar^2 l(l+1), where l is a nonnegative integer. For your second example, l would have to be fractional. It's possible for the total angular momentum (which includes both spin angular momentum and orbital angular momentum) to be fractional, but usually L refers to orbital angular momentum.

But in any case, it's overkill to consider raising and lowering operators. The fact that's relevant is that if L^2 has the value \hbar^2 l(l+1), then L_z can take on any of the following values:
  • l
  • l-1
  • l-2
  • ...
  • -l
 
  • Like
Likes gfd43tg
Hi stevedaryl,

sorry for my late response. I was able to go to my prof's office and get some help on this. Using your post alone, I was not equipped with the necessary understanding to answer this question. I needed to understand the sphere with cones inside to get some intuition for what ##l## and ##m## mean. After rereading your response, it makes sense what you were saying, I just needed to know about ##m##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top