How Do You Calculate Combustion Energy in Bomb Calorimetry?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating combustion energy using bomb calorimetry, specifically for benzoic acid and vanillin. The initial calculations for the heat capacity of the calorimeter and the energy of combustion per gram of vanillin are incorrect due to inconsistent units and misunderstanding of specific versus heat capacity. The correct approach requires recognizing that heat capacity is an extensive property, while specific heat is intensive. The calculations should involve dividing by the mass of the sample rather than multiplying, leading to accurate results. Clarification on these concepts is essential for proper calculations in calorimetry.
ScreamingIntoTheVoid

Homework Statement


The combustion of 0.1577 g benzoic acid increases the temperature of a bomb calorimeter by 2.51°C. a) Calculate the heat capacity of this calorimeter. (The energy released by combustion of benzoic acid is 26.42 kJ/g.)

A 0.2123-g sample of vanillin is then burned in the same calorimeter, and the temperature increases by 3.25°C.
b) What is the energy of combustion per gram of vanillin?
C)How about per mol?

2. Homework Equations

qv=mCv delta T

The Attempt at a Solution


a)26.42 kj/g x 0.1557g= 4.113594 kj=q
4.113594 kj= (0.1577g)(Cv)(2.51 Celsius) -> Cv=10.39240375 kj/celcius

b) (0.2123g)(10.39240375 kj/celsius)(3.25 celsius) = 7.17... kj/g ->7.17.../0.2123g = 33.78...

c) (33.78 kj/1g) x (152.15g/1 mol)= 5139.627 kj/mol

All those are wrong apparently... Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
4.113594 kj= (0.1577g)(Cv)(2.51 Celsius) -> Cv=10.39240375 kj/celcius
I don't understand what you calculate here, but the result is wrong and the units in the calculation are inconsistent as well. If your calorimeter would need 10.4 kJ to get heated by 1 K (don't use Celsius for differences), then 4 kJ couldn't heat it by more than 1 K, and certainly not by 2.51.
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
(0.2123g)(10.39240375 kj/celsius)(3.25 celsius) = 7.17... kj/g
Here the units are inconsistent as well.

(c) looks fine, it just starts with a wrong value from (b).
 
ScreamingIntoTheVoid said:
4.113594 kj= (0.1577g)(Cv)(2.51 Celsius) -> Cv=10.39240375 kj/celcius

You are confusing specific heat capacity (which requires some scaling factor, like mass or number of moles, to calculate the heat capacity) with a heat capacity, which is already a capacity of the whole calorimeter.

Do you know the difference between intensive and extensive properties?
 
In (b), you should have divided by 0.2123 gm, not multiplied by 0.2123 gm.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top