How Do You Calculate Net Electric Force in a Square Configuration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter =CIA= h1tman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity Force
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net electric force on the charged particles in a square configuration, start by applying Coulomb's law, F = kQq/(r^2), where k is the Coulomb constant. Each charge's interaction must be analyzed individually, considering both magnitude and direction, which requires a force diagram. Trigonometry will be necessary to resolve the forces into components, particularly for determining the net force on the +4.0 µC charge and the -5.0 µC charge. The discussion emphasizes the importance of showing calculations for individual forces to facilitate understanding and problem-solving.
=CIA= h1tman
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four charged particles are placed so that each particle is at the corner of a square. The sides of the square are 17 cm. The charge at the upper left corner is +4.0 µC, the charge at which the upper right corner is -5.0 µC, the charge at the lower left corner is -2.9 µC, and the charge at the lower right corner is -9.1 µC.

a) What is the magnitude of the net electric force on the +4.0 µC charge? (In Newtons).

b) What is the direction of this force (measured from the positive x-axis as an angle between -180 and 180, with counterclockwise positive? Answer in units of degrees.

c) What is the magnitude of the net electric force on the -5.0µC charge? (Answer in units of Newtons.)



Homework Equations



The Coulomb constant is 8.98755 x 10^9 N.


The Attempt at a Solution



I hope I posted this correctly, if not, I'm sorry for the trouble!

Thanks so much for the help, I've been trying to figure this out for days and just don't get it...There's another part to the problem that I might need help with, but I have to figure this part out first.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by drawing all four charges and then draw a force diagram for the charge of interest. You will probably find that you run into a bit of trigonometry.
 
But what equations should I use? (Other than trigonometry functions)
 
=CIA= h1tman said:
But what equations should I use? (Other than trigonometry functions)

Start with F = kQq/(r^2)
 
=CIA= h1tman said:
But what equations should I use? (Other than trigonometry functions)

|F|=k*q1*q2/r^2 and the fact that F is directed along the line between the two charges. Show us how you computed the force of ONE of the other charges on the +4 charge. That's good place to start. The forum helps those who help themselves.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top