How Do You Calculate the Motion of a Pebble in a Rolling Tire?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HeLLz aNgeL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling Tire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the motion of a pebble embedded in the tread of a rolling tire. The primary tasks include determining the velocity of the tire's axle relative to the ground, the position vector of the pebble over time, and subsequently its velocity and acceleration vectors. The participants explore using trigonometric functions to express the pebble's position based on the tire's rotation and translation. There is some confusion regarding the correct formulation of the position vector, particularly when incorporating the tire's horizontal movement. Ultimately, the derived position vector combines both the rotational and translational components of the pebble's motion.
HeLLz aNgeL
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are to find the coordinates of a pebble stuck in the tread of a rolling tire that is rotating counterclockwise (i.e., in the positive sense) with angular velocity omega. The tire rolls without slipping on the ground (which is at y = 0 ). The outer radius of the tire is R. At time t = 0 , the pebble is at the top of the tire, as shown.

a). Find the velocity of the axle of the tire relative to a fixed point on the ground, v_vec_ag(t). Note the order of the subscripts: velocity of axle measured relative to the ground. Express your answer in terms of R, omega, and x_unit and/or y_unit.

The pebble and tire have now rolled as shown in the figure. View Figure Answer the following questions for t>0.

b). Find the position vector of the pebble relative to the initial point of contact between the wheel and ground at a time t, r_pg_vec(t).
Express the position vector of the pebble in terms of R, omega, t, and the unit vectors x_unit and/or y_unit of the xy coordinate system shown.


c). Find v_vec_pg(t), the velocity vector of the pebble with respect to a fixed point on the ground, in terms of the unit vectors x_unit and y_unit of the xy coordinate system shown.
Express the velocity vector in terms of R, omega, t, and x_unit and/or y_unit.


d) Now find a_vec_pg(t), the acceleration vector of the pebble with respect to a fixed point on the ground.
Express your answer in terms of R, omega, t and x_unit and/or y_unit of the xy coordinate system shown.

The Attempt at a Solution



ok, for the first one, i know v = rw, but how do i write it in terms of vectors, v =rwx ?

and for part b, i have no clue how i should be approaching this ... just seems too weird :S
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 1,056
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    7.7 KB · Views: 1,003
Physics news on Phys.org
I think for part a), what they want is:

v_vec_ag(t) = -Rw\hat{x}... ie -Rw times a unit vector in the x-direction.

For part b), suppose the wheel was just rotating without any translation... (ie it is just rotating in place). What is the position vector relative to the initial point of contact? use sin, cos etc... the angle through which the wheel has rotated is wt...

then how does this position vector change when you take into account the horizontal velocity of the tire?

c) take the derivative of b).

d) take the derivative of c).
 
ok, so i know its Rsinwt(x) + RCoswt(y) and the initial position was just R(y)

so, relative to the initial position it should be Rsinwt(x)+(R(y)-RCoswt(y))

doesnt sound right, does it ?
 
bump ... anyone ?
 
HeLLz aNgeL said:
ok, so i know its Rsinwt(x) + RCoswt(y) and the initial position was just R(y)

so, relative to the initial position it should be Rsinwt(x)+(R(y)-RCoswt(y))

doesnt sound right, does it ?

Well... if translation wasn't there... here's what I get:

\vec{r} = -Rsin(wt)\hat{x} + (Rcos(wt)+R)\hat{y}

Now add the translation... -Rwt\hat{x}

so it comes out to:

\vec{r} = (-Rsin(wt)-Rwt)\hat{x} + (Rcos(wt)+R)\hat{y}
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top