How Do You Calculate Water Speed in a Pipe Using Bernoulli's Principle?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate water speed in a pipe using Bernoulli's Principle, start by applying the equation P + 1/2pv^2 = constant, where P is pressure and v is velocity. The continuity equation, A1v1 = A2v2, relates the cross-sectional areas and velocities at two points in the pipe. Given the pressures and areas, first solve for one velocity using the continuity equation, then substitute it back into Bernoulli's equation to find the second velocity. It's crucial to ensure all units are consistent and to carefully track the algebraic manipulation to avoid errors. Detailed calculations and clear steps will help clarify the solution process.
blue88
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have this problem:
Water flowing in a horizontal pipe is at a pressure of 1.5 105 Pa at a point where its cross-sectional area is 1.50 m2. When the pipe narrows to 0.400 m2, the pressure drops to 1.16 105 Pa.
(a) Find the water's speed in the wider pipe
(b) Find the water's speed in the narrower pipe.

I tried using Bernoulli's Principle but I can't get it.
I took the (p)(g)(h) out of both sides since the pipe's height doesn't change. And then I tried solving for v1 and v2 but there are two unknowns and I don't know what to do after that...

If anyone could help, that would be awesome.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: The flow is horizontal so gravity is not a consideration. You have Bernoulli's Principle to work with (pressure + kinetic energy per unit volume = constant) but you also have a continuity condition (flux times cross section = constant).
 
Hi, thanks for the info.

I tried using the equation, P + 1/2pv^2 = P + 1/2pv^2
and I ended up with two unknowns, the two different v^2.
So then I tried solving for 1 v using the AV=AV equation and then plugging it back into the first equation but that didn't come out right either...


Anymore suggestions?
Could anyone show me where I am messing this up?
 
You're approach seems correct. Show the details of your calculation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top