How Do You Solve the Integral of x^2 exp(-2amx^2/h)?

leroyjenkens
Messages
615
Reaction score
49
I attached the solution from the solution manual of the integral I'm trying to figure out.

\int_{-∞}^{∞}x^{2}exp(\frac{-2amx^{2}}{h})

The solution of that integral without the x2 in front is \sqrt{\frac{{\pi}h}{2am}}

So with the x2 I assumed I needed to do integration by parts.

So taking u = x2, du = 2xdx
And taking dv to be exp(\frac{-2amx^{2}}{h})

v = \sqrt{\frac{{\pi}h}{2am}}

But v would only equal that in a definite integral. When I'm doing integration by parts, I have an indefinite integral. So I'm kinda stuck here. When I put it into wolfram alpha, I get an error function for the answer to that indefinite integral. Do I put that answer in as v?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    5.7 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi leroyjenkens,
Reexpress $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^2 \exp(-2amx^2/h) dx = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x \cdot x \exp(-2amx^2/h)dx$$ Does this hint at a different choice of u and v'?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
leroyjenkens said:
I attached the solution from the solution manual of the integral I'm trying to figure out.

\int_{-∞}^{∞}x^{2}exp(\frac{-2amx^{2}}{h})

The solution of that integral without the x2 in front is \sqrt{\frac{{\pi}h}{2am}}

So with the x2 I assumed I needed to do integration by parts.

So taking u = x2, du = 2xdx
And taking dv to be exp(\frac{-2amx^{2}}{h})

v = \sqrt{\frac{{\pi}h}{2am}}

But v would only equal that in a definite integral. When I'm doing integration by parts, I have an indefinite integral. So I'm kinda stuck here. When I put it into wolfram alpha, I get an error function for the answer to that indefinite integral. Do I put that answer in as v?

Thanks.

You have the wrong u and v, since your dv is not integrable in terms of elementary functions. Try again.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks guys.
Does this hint at a different choice of u and v'?
Yes, that was clever.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top