How Does a Man's Walking Speed Affect His Shadow's Length on a Building Wall?

AI Thread Summary
A lamp is positioned 10 meters from a building, and a 1.8-meter tall man walks towards the building at a speed of 1.5 m/s. The discussion centers on calculating the rate at which the man's shadow on the wall shortens when he is 3.2 meters from the building, which is determined to be 0.58 m/s. Participants clarify the relationship between the man's distance from the lamp and the wall, emphasizing the use of similar triangles to derive the necessary formulas. The shadow indeed shortens as the man approaches the wall, confirming that his shadow's height is influenced by his proximity to the lamp.
whkoh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
A lamp is located on the ground 10 m from a building. A man 1.8 m tall walks from the light toward the building at a rate of 1.5 m s⁻¹. What is the rate at which the man's shadow on the wall is shortening when he is 3.2 m from the building ? Give your answer correct to two decimal places. [0.58 m/s]
----
I tried using similar triangles first to find the height of the lamp but nothing came out of that.
http://img364.imageshack.us/img364/5294/manbuilding9vw.png
let h be the height of the lamp
<br /> {h \over{x+10}} = {1.8 \over {x+3.2}}

<br /> h = { {1.8x+18} \over {x + 3.2}}<br />

How is the velocity of the man related to the height of the shadow? Or, what else should I find?

Also, shouldn't the shadow of the man on the wall become taller as he approaches the building?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is x? The distance the man is from the wall or the distance the man is from the lamp?


First rule for a problem like this is to draw a picture and label it carefully. I took x as the distance the man is from the lamp, because that gave simpler distances. Drawing a line from the lamp to the top of the man's head to the wall (i.e. the light ray that gives the top of the shadow) I see two similar right triangles. the smaller has the man as opposite side, so height 1.7m and base x. The larger has the wall as opposite side. Taking h as the height of the shadow, the height of this right triangle is h and the base is 10m. Since they are similar triangles, \frac{h}{10}= \frac{1.8}{x}.

You appear to have tried the same thing but have "10+ x" and "3.2+ x". I see no reason to add the distance from the lamp to the wall, especially since the man is standing between the lamp and the wall. If your x is the distance from the man to the wall (rather than the lamp) then the formula would be \frac{h}{10}= \frac{1.8}{10-x}.

I finally got around to looking at your picture. You have the lamp on the opposite side of the wall from the man!? How is the light getting through the wall? Where is it casting the shadow?

Also, the "3.2 m" is (related to) the specific value of x at which you want to find the rate of change. It has nothing to do with the general formula connecting h and x.

Once you have a general "static" formula for two quantities, you can find a formula relating their "rates of change" by differentiating with respect to t (using the chain rule since there is no t in the formula itself).
With my formula \frac{h}{10}= \frac{1.8}{x}, the derivative of \frac{h}{10} with respect to x is \frac{1}{10}\frac{dh}{dt} and the derivative of \frac{1.8}{x}= 1.8x^{-1} is -1.8x^{-2}\frac{dx}{dt}= \frac{-1.8}{x^2}\frac{dx}{dt}.
That is, from \frac{h}{10}= \frac{1.8}{x} we get \frac{1}{10}\frac{dh}{dt}=\frac{-1.8}{x^2}\frac{dx}{dt}. Now, set x= 10- 3.2= 6.8 (since my x is the distance from the lamp to the man, not from the wall to the man), set \frac{dx}{dt}= 1.5 m/s and solve for \frac{dh}{dt}[\itex].<br /> <br /> And, yes, the man&#039;s shadow gets smaller as he walks toward the wall. When he is right at the wall, his shadow is exactly his height. When he is very close to the lamp, he is blocking a lot of the light and his shadow is huge.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many thanks for your help.

I assumed that the lamp had a height and that's why I got everything wrong. Now I understand...

Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top