How Does a Variable Coefficient of Kinetic Friction Affect Block Acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining how a variable coefficient of kinetic friction affects the acceleration and velocity of a block being pushed across a surface. The coefficient of friction decreases linearly from μ0 at the start to zero at the end of the distance L. Participants identify errors in the initial calculations, particularly the omission of a factor of μ0 in the acceleration equation. The correct expression for the block's velocity at position x=L is derived, and suggestions are made for further simplification of the resulting formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of showing all steps in the calculations for clarity.
bestchemist
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A block of mass m is at rest at the origin at t=0. It is pushed with constant force F0 from x=0 to x=L across a horizontal surface whose coefficient of kinetic friction is μk=μ0(1−x/L). That is, the coefficient of friction decreases from μ0 at x=0 to zero at x=L.

Homework Equations



ax = (dvx/dx)vx
a = (F0 - mg(1-x/L))/m

The Attempt at a Solution


√(2L(F0m−μ0g))+√μ0gL

and it wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the problem?
 
voko said:
What is the problem?

find an expression for the block's velocity when it reaches position x=L.
Express your answer in terms of the variables L, F0, m, μ0, and appropriate constants.
 
bestchemist said:
find an expression for the block's velocity when it reaches position x=L.
Express your answer in terms of the variables L, F0, m, μ0, and appropriate constants.
Please show your work. It looks like you made some math errors, and you also left out a factor of μ0 in your equation for the acceleration.
 
Chestermiller said:
Please show your work. It looks like you made some math errors, and you also left out a factor of μ0 in your equation for the acceleration.

a = (F0 - mg(1-x/L))/m
vdx = (Fo/m)dx - uogdx + (uog/L)xdx
(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
I got
√(2L(F0m−μ0g))+√μ0gL
 
bestchemist said:
(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
Right so far
I got
√(2L(F0m−μ0g))+√μ0gL
That's certainly wrong. For others to see where you went wrong you will need to post every step of your working.
 
haruspex said:
Right so far
That's certainly wrong. For others to see where you went wrong you will need to post every step of your working.

(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
v^2 = 2 (Fo/m)x - 2 uogx+ 2(uog/2L)x^2
v^2 = 2x ((Fo/m)- uog) + (uog/L)x^2
v^2 = 2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL)

v= √(2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL))

is it right?
 
bestchemist said:
(1/2)v^2 = (Fo/m)x - uogx + (uog/2L)x^2
and solve for v and plug x = L
v^2 = 2 (Fo/m)x - 2 uogx+ 2(uog/2L)x^2
v^2 = 2x ((Fo/m)- uog) + (uog/L)x^2
v^2 = 2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL)

v= √(2L((Fo/m)- uog) + (uogL))

is it right?
Yes, but you can simplify it a little.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but you can simplify it a little.

Where can I simplify it? I thought I already simplified it to the most simplest form.
Can you give some hint?
 
  • #10
Check out the terms under the radical (which extends over the entire rhs), and see if you can combine anything.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
Check out the terms under the radical (which extends over the entire rhs), and see if you can combine anything.

okay.. got it
 
Last edited:
Back
Top