How Does Charge Distribution Affect Electric Potential at a Point?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at point P above a uniformly charged rod. The formula for electric potential is derived as V = 2 ∫ (1/4πε₀) (λ dx / √(d² + x²)), where r is the distance from point P to an infinitesimal point on the rod. In a scenario where one half of the rod has a negative charge and the other half has a positive charge, the electric potential at point P is zero. This cancellation occurs because the electric fields from the positive and negative halves of the rod are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction, following the principle of superposition. Thus, the net electric potential at point P is zero due to the opposing charges.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
There is a rod with uniform charge distribution lambda . Point P is located directly above the rod at a distance d from the centre of the rod. Find the electric potential at point P

Also in thee second part similar situation however one half of the rod has a negative charge distribution while the other is positivelambda.

For the first part

V = 2 \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\lambda dx}{r} where r is the distance from the poin P to the infinitesimal point on the rod and x is the horizontal axsi upon whihc the rod sits

so then r = \sqrt{d^2 + x^2}
and then it follows that

V = 2 \int \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{\lambda dx}{\sqrt{d^2 + x^2}}


For the second part

wouldnt i get a zero answer because instead of 2 times the expression you'd get one of those expresions and then the negative of it which when you add them (right?) they cancel out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, you are correct. In the second part, the electric potential at point P would be zero because the electric fields from the positive and negative halves of the rod would cancel each other out. This is due to the principle of superposition, which states that the total electric field at a point is the sum of the individual electric fields from each source. Since the electric fields from the positive and negative halves of the rod have equal magnitude but opposite direction, they cancel out and result in a net electric potential of zero.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top