How Does Electron Energy Affect Wavelength in a Square Well?

NeedPhysHelp8
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Square Potential Wells?

Homework Statement



An electron is moving past a square well with energy E=3U_{0}. What is the ratio of the de Broglie wavelength of the electron in the region x>L to the wavelength for 0<x<L?

Homework Equations


none that I can think of

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that for states of E greater than U_{0} the particle is not bound but free to move through all values of x. The free particle wave functions are sinusoidal both inside and outside the well. I think the wavelength should be shorter inside the well than outside because of greater kinetic energy than outside. But how do i prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


How is the particle's energy related to its momentum, and how is its momentum related to its wavelength?
 


I suppose, for the de Broglie wavelength, all you need to know is the momentum p. Classically, E (Kinetic) = p^2/2m. Can you go from there?
 


Hi thanks for the reply,
I understand that E= p^2/2m and then how to find wavelength from there. So that equation is for the kinetic energy outside the potential well for free particle where E=3Uo but what is the energy state inside the well? and why is it greater?
 


Energy is conserved. Outside the well, it has K=3U0 and U=0. Inside the well, U=-U0, so how much kinetic energy must it have?
 


oh I think I get it, so inside the well since U=-Uo then K=4Uo so energy is conserved! Thanks a lot Vela appreciate it
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top