How Does Gauss's Law Calculate Charge on a Cylindrical Shell?

AI Thread Summary
A cylindrical shell with a radius of 7 cm and a length of 240 cm has a uniformly distributed charge on its surface. The electric field measured 19 cm from the axis is 36.0 kN/C. Using Gauss's law, the charge on the shell can be calculated with the formula Q = (ERL)/(2K), resulting in a charge of approximately 9.12 x 10^-7 C. While the calculation appears correct, there is uncertainty about the method used to derive the initial expression for the electric field. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the application of Gauss's law for finite-length cylinders.
qwerty123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am stuck on this one. I apprciate your help greatly.

A cyllindrical shape of radius 7cm and length 240 cm has its charge uniformly distributed on its curved surface.The magnitude of the electric field at a point 19cm radially outward from its axis (measure from the mid point of the shell) is 36.0KN/C.Find the net charge on the shell.

PLZ show me the light. the part that says 19cm from the axis sounds fishy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done so far? Any thoughts at all? What's wrong with the 19 cm from the axis bit? Seems perfectly reasonable to me.
 
Gauss's law will only give an approximate answer for a cylinder of finite length. However, that may be good enough for your purposes here.

How can you use Gauss's law to find the electric field at any distance from the cylinder's axis? Have you done that, yet?
 
well, i found the electric field to be...

E= (2KQ)/(Lr) but they want me to solve for Q not for E so...

Q= (ERL)/(2K) --------> Q=(36x10^3)(.19m)(2.40m) / (2)(9x10^9)

Q=9.12x10^-7


i did this but could you double check. i checked in the back of the book, answer is correct but i am not sure if this is the right wa to do it bcause sometimes I get the right answer but not doing it the way it is supposed to.
 
Looks ok to me. Of course, I don't know how you arrived at your first expression...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top