How Does Length Contraction Affect Light Ray Perception in Different Frames?

ijustlost
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
A rod of length 2l is at rest in frame O' with co-ords (x',y',z')=(±l,λ,0)

Observer O moves at speed u along the x axis.

The first part of the question is just to derive the length contraction - fine, O measures the length as 2l / γ

The next part has me stuck:

"Show that, at t = 0, the observer O sees the light rays from the two ends of the rod
coming in at angles that lead to an apparent length of 2lγ (making the assumption
that the rod is oriented parallel to the x-axis with a y separation of λ from the origin).
Comment briefly on the discrepancy between the two results. "

I've tried drawing space-time diagrams, and just got in a bit of a mess. I can work out equations for the worldlines of the front and back of the pole (e.g. for one end (ct,x,y,z) = (ct'γ - lγ u/c, γ t'-lγ ,λ,0) etc), but setting t=0 for front and back just gives the 2l / γ. result
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The light rays are sent in the same time at the rod system or in the same time at the observer's system. In the first case, the ray sent from the beginning of the rod will be advanced in time gamma*l*u^2 seconds and the ray sent from the end will be delayed the same quantity.

The result will be that it looks like the rays have been sent from a distance that looks (gamma*l). You can also transform the vector 2*l x+0 t from the Rod system to the observer system, it will become 2*l*gamma.
 
The light rays are sent in the same time at the rod system or in the same time at the observer's system. In the first case, the ray sent from the beginning of the rod will be advanced in time gamma*l*u^2 seconds and the ray sent from the end will be delayed the same quantity.

The result will be that it looks like the rays have been sent from a distance that looks (gamma*l). You can also transform the vector 2*l x+0 t from the Rod system to the observer system, it will become 2*l*gamma.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top