How Does Phase Difference Affect Wave Interference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffreythelm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resultant wave's relative intensity and phase when two infinite waves with different amplitudes and a phase difference of 125 degrees are combined. The user has derived the resultant amplitude using the formula for two waves, resulting in an amplitude squared of 34, which relates to relative intensity. However, confusion arises regarding the proper expression of the resultant wave in the form A sin(kx - ωt + φ) and the definitions of various phase terms. The phase difference is clarified as the difference between the phase constants of the two waves, leading to a better understanding of how to express the resultant phase. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying trigonometric identities and understanding wave interference principles.
geoffreythelm
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm getting so confused about this question, any help would be great. :)

Homework Statement



Two infinite waves Ψ1, Ψ2 have the same wavelength and polarisation and have amplitudes of E1 = 3 and E2 = 7 units. They are added together with a phase difference of 125 degrees.

1) What will be the relative intensity of the resultant wave? Assume initial phase of 0 degrees for Ψ1.

2) In the same conditions, what will be the phase of the resultant wave (in degrees)?

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution

So far I've got Ψ1=3sin(kx-ωt) and Ψ2=7sin(kx-ωt+2.182)
And I know that I is proportional to A squared.

Now I'm pretty stuck!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the help, ehild!

I've found a formula in my notes for resultant amplitude of 2 waves: (A3)^2 = (A1)^2 + (A2)^2 + 2(A1)(A2)cos(δ)

So using this, I get an (A3)^2 of 34, which I suppose is the relative Intensity. Not sure how I should answer this on the question though, I haven't really specified the relative intensities of A1 and A2.

As far as part 2 goes, when I add up Ψ1 and Ψ2, I get stuck with some terms I can't get rid of, and I certainly can't put it into a nice 'A sin(kx-wt +φ)' form.
I'm also getting a bit confused about usage of δ, φ, α, ε, phase, phase difference, phase constant, etc. In my notes I found the following for resultant phase difference (I think):

tanα=(A1sinα1+A2sinα2)/(A1cosα1+A2cosα2)

Not sure if this is of any use.

When I add together the 2 waveforms I get Ψ3=3+7cosδ(sin(kx-ωt))+7sinδ(cos(kx-ωt)).

Thanks again for the response!
 
You get the relative intensities of the original waves as the square of the amplitudes.
The sum of the two waves is equal with a third one, which is
A3 sin(kx-wt +α) with the terms in your notes. The whole argument of the sine function is the phase of the wave. You see, it changes both with time t and place x. The constant term , 2.182 radian in case of Ψ2 is the phase constant. It is zero in case of Ψ1. The phase constant is the phase at t=0 and x =0, the problem refers to it as initial phase.

The resultant amplitude is given for waves with phase difference δ which is the same as the difference of the phase constants:
δ=(wt-kx+2.182)-(wt-kx)=2.182.

The phase constant of the resultant wave is given in your notes for two waves: one with amplitude A1 and phase constant α1, the other with amplitude A2 and phase constant α2. A1=3 and the phase constant of the first wave α1=0 in the problem, and A2=7, α2 = 2.182 or 125°. From these, you get the phase constant α of the resultant wave.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top