How Does Quantum Mechanics Describe Free-Particle Probability Amplitudes?

rar0308
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Problem10.1, Introductory QM,Liboff.

Homework Statement


If \psi (\mathbf{r},t) is a free-particle state and b(\mathbf{k},t) the momentum probability amplitude for this same state, show that
\iiint \psi^* \psi d \mathbf{r}=\iiint b^* b d \mathbf{k}

Homework Equations



\psi_\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{r},t) = Ae^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)} (10.14)
\hbar \omega = E_k
\delta (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r'}) = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^3} \iiint e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r'})} d \mathbf{k} (10.20)
d \mathbf{k} = dk_x dk_y dk_z
\psi (\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{(2 \pi)^{3/2}}\iiint b(\mathbf{k},t)e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}-\omega t)} d \mathbf{k} (10.22)
b(\mathbf{k},t) = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^{3/2}}\iiint\psi (\mathbf{k},t) e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)} d \mathbf{r} (10.23)
d \mathbf{r}=dxdydz


The Attempt at a Solution



1.I substituted eq 22 into left-hand side of problem's equation. Then I don't know how to go further. I think there will be some manipulation on the equation but I'm lacking some knowledge how to do it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is a simple case of Plancherel theorem. What is B equal to, if you're given its Fourier transformation ?
 
rar0308 said:
b(\mathbf{k},t) = \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^{3/2}}\iiint\psi (\mathbf{k},t) e^{i(\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r} - \omega t)} d \mathbf{r} (10.23)
d \mathbf{r}=dxdydz
Is this a Fourier transform?
 
Yes. Then what is b equal to ? Can you perform that integration, once you know psi ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top