How Does Quantum Tunneling Affect Electron Reflection Probability?

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


Calculate the reflection probability for a 5 eV electron encountering a step in which the potential drops by 2 eV




The Attempt at a Solution


To answer this question, wouldn't I need to know where E > U or U > E? Also wouldn't I need to know the width of the potential barrier it's trying to penetrate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way I understand the question is as follows:

Take the potential function
$$
V(x) = \left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
0 & x \le 0 \\
- 2\text{ eV} & x > 0
\end{array}
\right.
$$
and consider an electron coming in from ##x = -\infty## with an energy of 5 eV.
 
PsychonautQQ said:

Homework Statement


Calculate the reflection probability for a 5 eV electron encountering a step in which the potential drops by 2 eV

The Attempt at a Solution


To answer this question, wouldn't I need to know where E > U or U > E? Also wouldn't I need to know the width of the potential barrier it's trying to penetrate?

From what you say,I see that you haven't understood the question,and so you can't get the answer.
An important point that seems you don't know,is that only potential energy difference has physical significance.So you can choose where the potential is zero arbitrarily and so a constant potential can always be called zero.The problem is saying that an electron is moving in a constant potential till it reaches a potential drop.So we can call the potential before the potential drop to be zero and negative after that.Also because no other change in potential is stated,we can assume that the potential is constant till it drops somewhere and then stays constant again and so there is no width.Also its not a potential barrier,you can call it a potential canyon,starting at the point of drop and continuing till infinity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top