How Does Shortening a Rope Affect Astronauts' Angular Momentum?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the new angular momentum of two astronauts connected by a rope after one astronaut shortens the rope from length d to d/3. The initial angular momentum was correctly calculated as L = Mvd. However, the attempt to find the new angular momentum using the formula L = Mv(1/6)d led to confusion, as the website indicated the answer was incorrect. The key point is that angular momentum is conserved, and the new angular momentum should account for the increased velocity due to the decreased distance. The correct approach involves recognizing that the new angular momentum remains proportional to the original parameters, emphasizing the conservation principle.
haydn
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two astronauts, each having a mass M, are connected by a rope of length d having negligible mass. They are isolated in space, orbiting their center of mass at speeds v. (Use M, d, and v as appropriate in your equations for each of the following questions.)

By pulling on the rope, one of the astronauts shortens the distance between them to d/3.
(c) What is the new angular momentum of the system?

Homework Equations



L = mvrsin\theta

L = I\omega

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the angular momentum when the two astronauts were a distance d between each other and got the correct answer, L = Mvd

For the new angular momentum, I thought I would do the same thing just replacing r in the first equation listed above:

distance between astronaut and pivot point = (1/6)d

L (per astronaut) = Mv(1/6)d
2L = (1/3)Mvd

The website I'm using is telling me it's wrong though... can anyone help?P.S. in the picture it shows the pivot point being the center of the rope connecting the astronauts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is conserved, so it is still mvd where v and d are from the original situation. It is also m*v2*d2, where the new v2 is larger than the old v and the new d2 is smaller than the old d.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top