How Does Static Friction Determine the Limits of Force on an Inclined Wedge?

BnT
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass.5kg rests on the inclined surface of a wedge of mass 2kg. The wedge is acted on by a horizontal force F and slides on a frictionless surface. (a) If the coefficient of static friction between the wedge and the block is .8 and the angle of incline is 35 degrees, find the max and min values of F for which the block does not slip.


Homework Equations


Ff= mu(Fn)
Free Body Diagrams-- sum of forces

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a free body diagram and all, but then realized that I only know that when the coefficient of friction is kinetic, then it is greater than or equal to, which helps to provide a min and max, however, how can that be computable with static friction, when it is actually equal to force of friction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really are looking for the static friction coefficient, after all the block is not moving until you reach that very threshold. Just add all your vector components and it ought to be pretty straight forward, I would suggest a rotated coordinate system.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top