How does static friction do work?

AI Thread Summary
Static friction can indeed do work, contrary to the initial belief that it cannot. The discussion highlights that work is dependent on the reference frame, as illustrated by the example of a box on a conveyor belt. In an inertial frame, static friction causes the box to accelerate and gain kinetic energy, indicating work is done. However, in a non-inertial frame moving with the box, static friction appears to do no work since the box does not accelerate relative to that frame. This nuanced understanding emphasizes the importance of reference frames in physics.
c_programmer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Static friction can never do work on an object.
a. True
b. False

Homework Equations


The answer is False, indicating that static friction can do work.


The Attempt at a Solution


W=fd, when d=0 w=0 regardless of the force.

How does this work? Or is the online homework wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I might have an answer. Imagine a box on top of another, there is a large static friction coefficient between the two boxes and none on the floor. When the bottom box is moved the static friction will cause the box to move, thus doing work. Is this correct?
 
Yes, I thought of the same counter example. However in the reference frame of the contact surface, static friction can't do work.
 
Work always depends on the reference frame.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Work always depends on the reference frame.

Chet

Why does work depend of the reference frame? If we do work isn't it the change of kinetic energy equal for all observers? The velocity vectors may change, of course, but the difference shouldn't for two inertial frames. Is it different for non-inertial frames?
 
VictorH said:
Why does work depend of the reference frame? If we do work isn't it the change of kinetic energy equal for all observers? The velocity vectors may change, of course, but the difference shouldn't for two inertial frames. Is it different for non-inertial frames?
Yes. You hit the nail on the head. Consider the case of a box on a conveyor belt, and the speed of the belt is increasing with time. So the frictional force is causing the box to accelerate, and the box is gaining kinetic energy. Now consider this same situation from the perspective of an accelerating frame of reference that is moving with the box. From this frame of reference, the frictional force is not doing any work, and the box is not accelerating. The frictional force is being balanced by the apparent horizontal body force acting on the box (associated with the acceleration).

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top