How Does Tension Vary Along a Rotating Rod?

  • Thread starter Thread starter f(x)
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the tension in a rotating rod, specifically at points L/4 and 3L/4 from a pivot. Participants are trying to determine the relationship between the tensions T_1 and T_2, emphasizing the need to consider the mass of the rod and the radius when calculating centripetal forces. It is clarified that T_1 must provide the necessary centripetal force for the portion of the rod beyond L/4, while T_2 does the same for the portion beyond 3L/4. The importance of using the correct radius, specifically the distance to the center of mass, is highlighted to accurately relate the tensions. Ultimately, the conclusion drawn is that T_1 is greater than T_2, aligning with the hint provided in the problem.
f(x)
Messages
182
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rod of length L is pivoted at one end and is rotated with a uniform angular velocity in a horizontal plane . Let T_1 and T_2 be the tensions at points L/4 and 3L/4 from the pivoted end, then what's the relation between T_1 and T_2 ?

Help Needed - :

Ok, this is a question from circular motion. I know that the net force must be mrw^2 towards the center at both points, but I am having trouble figuring what m I must use at r=L/4 and r=3L/4 . Also, can somebody explain how tension acts in this problem...since the rod has a mass, tension is different along both directions at the same point, but there is only a single value provided ?
Plz help I don't need the solution, just help me clear the concepts
TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi f(x),

f(x) said:

Homework Statement


A rod of length L is pivoted at one end and is rotated with a uniform angular velocity in a horizontal plane . Let T_1 and T_2 be the tensions at points L/4 and 3L/4 from the pivoted end, then what's the relation between T_1 and T_2 ?

Help Needed - :

Ok, this is a question from circular motion. I know that the net force must be mrw^2 towards the center at both points, but I am having trouble figuring what m I must use at r=L/4 and r=3L/4 . Also, can somebody explain how tension acts in this problem...since the rod has a mass, tension is different along both directions at the same point, but there is only a single value provided ?
Plz help I don't need the solution, just help me clear the concepts
TIA

If you think about T1, what is T1 doing to the part of the rod that is past the point at L/4? What expression can you write for T1 based on that? Do you see how to get the answer?
 
alphysicist said:
If you think about T1, what is T1 doing to the part of the rod that is past the point at L/4? What expression can you write for T1 based on that? Do you see how to get the answer?
Hello sir,

OK, I spent some more time and I feel that T1 at L/4 from pivot causes the rest of the rod to rotate, hence , T1 must provide the necessary centripetal force. But I am confused as to what should be the value of Mass and Radius in this case. Can you please help with this ?
Thanks
 
f(x) said:
Hello sir,

OK, I spent some more time and I feel that T1 at L/4 from pivot causes the rest of the rod to rotate, hence , T1 must provide the necessary centripetal force.

That's right.

But I am confused as to what should be the value of Mass and Radius in this case. Can you please help with this ?
Thanks

Remember that you are not looking for the values of T1 and T2, you are looking for how they are related. (Is one twice as much as the other, or one-third, etc.) This is essentially a ratio and so many of the common factors will cancel.

They directly give you the radius values for each case: L/4 and 3L/4. Now if the entire rod has mass M, what is the mass that T1 accelerates? and T2?

Then taking the ratio gives how they are related. What do you get?
 
alphysicist said:
They directly give you the radius values for each case: L/4 and 3L/4. Now if the entire rod has mass M, what is the mass that T1 accelerates? and T2?

Then taking the ratio gives how they are related. What do you get?

ok,T_1/T_2 = (m_1.r_1.w^2)(m_2.r_2.w^2) = (3M/4).(L/4)/(M/4).(3L/4) = 1
But that is incorrect, because the book says ( Hint: T_1 > T_2 )
I had a doubt, since the body was elongated, isn't it wrong to take radius as L/4 instead of the distance to COM from pivot ?
Thx
 
Last edited:
f(x) said:
ok,T_1/T_2 = (m_1.r_1.w^2)(m_2.r_2.w^2) = (3M/4).(L/4)/(M/4).(3L/4) = 1
But that is incorrect, because the book says ( Hint: T_1 > T_2 )
I had a doubt, since the body was elongated, isn't it wrong to take radius as L/4 instead of the distance to COM from pivot ?
Thx

That's right; in my last post I was not just giving you the r values to plug into your equation. I was pointing out that since you know the radius of the point that each force is acting on, you can figure out everything you need for your equations.
 
So , in general for any rotational problem with an elongated continuous mass, Magnitude of Radius Vector is equal to Distance from axis of rotation to the Centre of MAss of the body, right ?

Also, I get 15/7 as the answer
 
Back
Top