How Does the Doppler Effect Influence Sound Frequency at the Great Wall?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Doppler Effect as it relates to sound frequency when a stationary air horn emits a 500Hz sound towards the Great Wall of China, with a person running towards the wall at 3 m/s. The initial calculation for the frequency of the sound reaching the wall is correct at 504.3Hz, but the reflection needs to be considered for the final frequency heard by the runner. After accounting for the reflection, the frequency of the sound perceived by the runner is calculated to be 495.75Hz, leading to a beat frequency of 8.6Hz. The participants confirm the calculations and clarify the effects of the Doppler shift in this scenario.
rmorelan
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a little confused about some aspects of sound waves. I was hoping to just check to see if I am on the right track.

I have a problem where a guy is moving towards the great wall of china, with a air horn, emitting a constant frequency sound of 500Hz. The sounds is going to hit the great wall and bounce back, introducing some interferance. The speed of sound is 350m/s. The persons is running towards the wall at 3/ms, and I have to find the frequency of amplitude beats he hears and the frequency of the sound he hears reflected.

ok, so f' = (v/(v +/- Vs)*f

He is moving towards the wall, so Vs is negative? This gives

f' = (350/(347)) * 500 = 504.3Hz

Is the frequency of beats then just the difference, ie (504.3-500)Hz for 4.3Hz beat Hz. Am I making any sense?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes I believe that's right.
 
rmorelan said:
Hi, I am a little confused about some aspects of sound waves. I was hoping to just check to see if I am on the right track.

I have a problem where a guy is moving towards the great wall of china, with a air horn, emitting a constant frequency sound of 500Hz. The sounds is going to hit the great wall and bounce back, introducing some interferance. The speed of sound is 350m/s. The persons is running towards the wall at 3/ms, and I have to find the frequency of amplitude beats he hears and the frequency of the sound he hears reflected.

ok, so f' = (v/(v +/- Vs)*f

He is moving towards the wall, so Vs is negative? This gives

f' = (350/(347)) * 500 = 504.3Hz

Is the frequency of beats then just the difference, ie (504.3-500)Hz for 4.3Hz beat Hz. Am I making any sense?

thanks!

No. There is reflection here, so you need to take into account two different Doppler effects. What you found is the frequency of the wave reaching the wall. Now, this wave is reflected and travels back to the guy. You need to do another Doppler effect calculation with this time the guy being the observer so you will need to multiply the frequency you found by another factor (with now the source, which is the wall, being at rest and the observer moving toward the source at 3 m/s).

Once you get the final frequency, you just subtract 500Hz to get the beat frequency, as you had done.

Patrick
 
I see, of course :)
 
ok, I am still a little confused but things are a bit clearer :)

Actually I made a mistake anyway, the air horn is actually stuck into the ground, so it doesn't move, just the guy running towards the "great wall of china". I should learn to read!

So we have a setup like

(((( horn )))) man -> [ wall ]

So he is moving way from the source, and towards the reflected wave I guess from the wall. So there is two doppler effects? One being:

f' = (350/(353)) * 500 = 495.75Hz ( what the sound behind him sounds like)

and

f' = (350/(347)) * 500 = 504.3Hz (what the reflected sound sounds like )

i am assuming the sound actually reflected is 500 Hz, the frequency of the emitted sounds, as the doppler effect doesn't change the frequency relative to the other standary objects ie the wall, and source are moving.

So the difference would be then 504.3 - 495.8 = 8.6 Hz?

Thanks a lot everyone, this stuff is really messing me up :)

rk
 
Looks like you got it just fine.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
967
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top