How does wind acceleration affect the speed and direction of a sailboat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wind
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed and direction of a sailboat after experiencing a gust of wind that accelerates it at 0.70 m/s² at an angle of 40 degrees north of east. The initial speed is 4.5 m/s east, and the calculations involve breaking down the acceleration into x and y components. Participants point out that the original calculations mix velocity and acceleration, leading to incorrect results. The correct approach requires determining the effective acceleration for both axes and applying linear motion equations to find the final velocity. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of accurately distinguishing between acceleration and velocity in physics problems.
ere
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sailboat is traveling east at 4.5ms-1. a suddent gust of wind gives the boat an acceleration a = 0.70 ms-2, 40 degress north to east. what are the boat's speed and direction 6s later when the gust subsides?

Homework Equations


V(@6s) = V(init.) + at

The Attempt at a Solution


i seriously have not a clue where to start. tried to look it up in books and online but i still don't know what to do with the acceleration.
so the a(x) = 0.70cos40 V(x) = 4.5
a(y) = 0.70sin40 V(y) = 0 am i right?​
thus, V(6s)(x) = 4.5 + .070cos40(6) = 7.7174
V(6s)(y) = 0 + 0.70sin40(6) = 3.8567​
therefore, direction n in degree:
tan(n) = 3.8567 / 7.7174, n = 26.55 degrees​
velocity = (7.7174^2 + 3.8567^2)^(1/2) = 8.6274​
and i am told that i am wrong. hope you guys can point out why. thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It does not appear to me that you have enough inforation to solve the problem. You need the time of the acceleration.

Unless it is a trick question and the answer is 4.5m/s, East...

Anyway, your analysis is certainly wrong as you are mixing velocity and acceleration.
 
oops sorry i left that out. just edited the thread.
 
Well, then the answer is that you mixed acceleration and speed. You need to use the acceleration and the time to calculate the magnitude of the second speed vector before adding the two vectors together.
 
ere said:
so the a(x) = 0.70cos40 V(x) = 4.5
a(y) = 0.70sin40 V(y) = 0 am i right?​
thus, V(6s)(x) = 4.5 + .070cos40(6) = 7.7174
V(6s)(y) = 0 + 0.70sin40(6) = 3.8567​
therefore, direction n in degree:
tan(n) = 3.8567 / 7.7174, n = 26.55 degrees​
velocity = (7.7174^2 + 3.8567^2)^(1/2) = 8.6274​
and i am told that i am wrong. hope you guys can point out why. thanks!

What is wrong? and Where? What do you mean by confusing velocity and acceleration? Find the effective acceleration for both Y and X axis, then use the
linear laws of motion to get the final velocity components? Why is this wrong?
 
ere said:
V(6s)(y) = 0 + 0.70sin40(6) = 3.8567[/indent]

This calculation seems to have error
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top