How Does x in Equation 6.24 Become a(1-cosӨ)?

Hamza Abbasi
Messages
47
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


This is the solution of Brachistochrone .

upload_2015-9-26_19-47-36.png

upload_2015-9-26_19-48-17.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am very confused that how the x in equation(6.24) get its value a(1-cosӨ) ? What is the technique behind this solution of x?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-9-26_19-40-17.png
    upload_2015-9-26_19-40-17.png
    64.3 KB · Views: 785
  • upload_2015-9-26_19-44-33.png
    upload_2015-9-26_19-44-33.png
    55.1 KB · Views: 716
  • upload_2015-9-26_19-45-3.png
    upload_2015-9-26_19-45-3.png
    11.2 KB · Views: 619
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just a clever substitution that replaces x. How to find that:
- in theory: "oh, it is completely obvious that this substitution will lead to a nice solution!"
- in practice: "let's try several approaches until one of them works"
 
Why only a(1-cosӨ ? What is the theory behind this substitution?
 
There is no deeper theory. It is a clever definition of Ө. You can see that it works nicely later.

You could also choose x=Ө2 + 3 cos(Ө) but that wouldn't help.
 
Hamza Abbasi said:
Why only a(1-cosӨ ? What is the theory behind this substitution?
To motivate the substitution (6.24), first make the substitution x = au in (6.23). Then complete the square in the denominator. From your experience with integration, you should then see what might be another good substitution to further simplify the integral.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top