How far behind the front wheels is the center of mass located?

AI Thread Summary
To find the center of mass of a car, the vehicle's weight is measured with the front and rear wheels on a scale, yielding readings of 5.70 x 10^3 N and 6.30 x 10^3 N, respectively. The distance between the wheels is 3.32 m, and the discussion involves using moments to determine the center of mass location. One approach suggested is to set the moments around the back wheel equal when the front is on the scale, and vice versa for the rear. This method allows for solving the unknown distance behind the front wheels without needing to know the mass or gravitational acceleration. The conversation emphasizes understanding the principles of moments in physics to solve the problem effectively.
superjen
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
To determine the location of the center of mass of a car, the car is driven over a scale. When the front wheels are over the scale, the weight recorded by the scale is 5.70 x 103 N. When the rear wheels are over the scale, the scale reads 6.30 x 103 N. The distance between the front and rear wheels is 3.32 m. How far behind the front wheels is the center of mass located?


The equation i was using was

X = m1x1 + m2x2 / (m1+m2)
m1 = 5.70 x 103 N = 581.039kg
m2 = 6.30 x 103 N = 642.202kg
X = ?
x1 = 3.32
x2 = 3.32 - x

i don't understand how to fill in the rest. maybe I've gotten something done wrong here! Help will be awesome :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a FBD of the car with the reactions that support it. When it is on the scale, one of the reactions id provided by the scale. See if that will get you going.
 
i've tried this, but i still get nowhere.
 
It looks like you are trying to work out the centre of mass treating the car like it is two separate weights, placed at the front and back wheels. I don't think that will work very well. Here is how I would approach the problem, assuming you have learned about moments. If you haven't learned about moments, ignore this post.

When the front wheel is on the scale, you can consider the moments arround the back wheel, as the car is not rotating, the clockwise and anticlockwise moments are equal:
moment due to mass = moment due to force on scale
Mass x g x (3.32-L) = force1 x 3.32

You can do the same when the back wheel is on the scale:
moment due to mass = moment due to force on scale
Mass x g x L = force2 x 3.32

You should then be able to work out L, even withought knowing the mass (or g for that matter)

Hope this helps
Jack

PS: This is my first attempt at answereing questions in this forum. I'm trying to give hints without giving answers. Mods and experienced members feel free to critise.
 
Last edited:
so. say if this was the way i went

Mass x g x (3.32-L) = force1 x 3.32

what would my mass and g be?
 
You don't need to know (unless the question asks for them?). It is possible to work out L by using the two equations I gave together.

g is the accelaration due to gravity is 9.81ms-2, Mass is unknown, but could also be found from the two equations I gave.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top