How Far is the Spaceship from the Planet at the Time of Explosion in its Frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a spaceship exploding while approaching a planet, with the goal of determining the distance from the planet at the time of the explosion in the spaceship's frame. The Lorentz transformations are applied to find the coordinates of the explosion in both the planet's frame and the spaceship's frame. The calculations reveal that the time on the spaceship clock at the moment of the explosion is influenced by the velocity of the spaceship and the distance L from the planet. It is noted that the distance from the planet, as perceived in the spaceship's frame, is subject to length contraction. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the correct application of the Lorentz transformations and the implications of length contraction in this scenario.
greendog77
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A spaceship is approaching a planet at a speed v. Suddenly, the spaceship explodes and releases a sphere of photons traveling outward as seen in the spaceship frame. The explosion occurs in the planet frame when the spaceship is a distance L away from the planet. In the ship's frame, how far is it from the planet at the time of the explosion?

Homework Equations



Lorentz transformations:

x = \gamma(x' - vt)
t = \gamma(t - vx/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



I began by directly applying a Lorentz transformation:
x = \gamma(-L - vt) = -\gammaL

This would mean that the planet is a distance \gammaL from the planet in its own frame when it explodes. However, I recalled that to apply a Lorentz transformation, the origins of S' and S must coincide at time t = 0. I'm not quite sure how to apply this requirement to the problem, as the spaceship never reaches the planet. I imagined attaching a long pole to the spaceship such that at the time of explosion in the ship's frame, the end of the pole just reaches the planet (so that something coincides with the planet at time t = 0). Then I got even more confused because the pole reaching the planet and the rocket exploding occurs at different times in the planet frame. Could you guys help me with this problem? Also, is there a way that the Lorentz transformation can be generalized so that it is not necessary for the two coordinate systems to coincide at t = 0? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's assume that the origins of S and S' would have coincided at t=t'= 0 if the spaceship at x' =0 had not exploded when the ship was a distance L from the planet x = 0. So the x location at which the spaceship exploded was x = -L. Since the spaceship was traveling at velocity v, in terms of L and v, at what time t on the clocks in S did the spaceship explode? Using the Lorentz Transformation, at what time t' on the spaceship clock did the explosion take place. As reckoned from the spaceship frame of reference, how far would the planet have moved toward the spaceship during the time interval between t' (at which it exploded) and t' = 0? This is the distance reckoned from the spaceship frame of reference.

Chet
 
The time t on the clocks in S would have read simply -L/v. The spacetime coordinate of the explosion in the S frame would thus be (-L/v, -L). This means that in S', the coordinate of the explosion would be
(\gamma(-L/v+vL/c^2),\gamma(-L+L)) = (\gamma(-L/v+vL/c^2),0).
This means that the time t' on the spaceship clock is \gamma(-L/v+vL/c^2) at the time of explosion, and the distance that it is from the planet is \gamma(-L+v^2L/c^2). This seems to give me the right answer, thanks so much! Is there a way that the Lorentz transformations can be generalized to fit such a problem?
 
greendog77 said:
The time t on the clocks in S would have read simply -L/v. The spacetime coordinate of the explosion in the S frame would thus be (-L/v, -L). This means that in S', the coordinate of the explosion would be
(\gamma(-L/v+vL/c^2),\gamma(-L+L)) = (\gamma(-L/v+vL/c^2),0).
This means that the time t' on the spaceship clock is \gamma(-L/v+vL/c^2) at the time of explosion, and the distance that it is from the planet is \gamma(-L+v^2L/c^2). This seems to give me the right answer, thanks so much! Is there a way that the Lorentz transformations can be generalized to fit such a problem?

Well done. I hope you also realize that:

-\gamma(-L+v^2L/c^2)=-L/γ

So the distance, as reckoned from the S' frame of reference, is contracted. Thus, this could have been analyzed as a straight length contraction problem.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top