How far will a pullback car go? Spring and friction coefficients.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining how far a pullback toy car will travel before stopping, focusing on the effects of spring and friction coefficients. The equations of motion are established, indicating that the spring constant becomes irrelevant later in the car's run, where friction plays a dominant role. A proposed method for measuring the coefficient of friction involves adjusting the angle of a ramp until the car begins to roll, but concerns are raised about the accuracy of this method if the car is pulled back beforehand. The conversation also highlights the distinction between static and kinetic friction, noting that rolling friction and air resistance are significant when the car has rolling wheels. Overall, the participants seek effective ways to measure both the friction and spring coefficients without disassembling the toy.
Totally
Messages
26
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A pullback toy car is pulled back. How far will it go before it stops?

x(0)=0
v(0)=0
a(x<x0)=-k(x0-x)
a(x>x0)=μg
v(tf)=0
tf=D

Homework Equations



Fs=-kx
F=mg
Ff=μF

The Attempt at a Solution





d2x/dt2=1/m(k(x0-x)-μmg)

Later in the run spring constant is irrelevant, so
d2/dt2=1/m(-μmg)



I think I can figure out the μ by pulling the car back on the ramp and lowering the angle between the ramp and the surface until car starts rolling. Then the tangent of that angle tanθ=μ

Would this be correct? Also, what experiment or method would you propose to figure out the coefficient of spring? Disassembling the toy is not an option.

I apologize I didn't put formulas the proper way, however I couldn't get Latex to work even though I followed FAQ instructions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is assuming you are letting the car go down the ramp and are slowly increasing the angle of inclination.

I believe that the use of a ramp is correct in finding the coefficient of friction but it should be done without puling back the car. If it were pulled back, the spring force may easily overcome the frictional force at a smaller angle and the reading would be incorrect.
 
Is the car sliding on the horizontal surface? If it has rolling wheels then the coefficient of static or kinetic friction becomes irrelevant and rolling friction and air resistance will be the retarding forces. If it is sliding and air resistance is negligible, we can consider kinetic friction and work energy rule will give the results easily.
 
Sunil Simha said:
This is assuming you are letting the car go down the ramp and are slowly increasing the angle of inclination.

I believe that the use of a ramp is correct in finding the coefficient of friction but it should be done without puling back the car. If it were pulled back, the spring force may easily overcome the frictional force at a smaller angle and the reading would be incorrect.

I guess I wasn't clear enough, I was thinking about pulling the car back at the lower end of the plane and lowering the angle until it can climb the ramp.

mukundpa said:
Is the car sliding on the horizontal surface? If it has rolling wheels then the coefficient of static or kinetic friction becomes irrelevant and rolling friction and air resistance will be the retarding forces. If it is sliding and air resistance is negligible, we can consider kinetic friction and work energy rule will give the results easily.

Interesting approach, thanks for the idea! And yes, the toy is being pulled back on the horizontal surface. Do you have any ideas how to figure out the spring coefficient?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top