How Far Will Boom-Boom Slapshot Travel in Snow After Sliding Down an Icy Hill?

Brodo17
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Boom-Boom Slapshot, Canadian hockey star, slides down a 50m long ice covered hill on his skates. The frictionless hill is inclined at 35° to the horizontal. Once he reaches the bottom of the hill, the ice is covered with deep snow that has a coefficient of kinetic friction of .50
How far into the snow will BoomBoom go before coming to rest?



Equations
acceleration = fparallel / mass
vf^2 = 2a Δd
f = µFN
FN = opposite of Fg which is mass x 9.8


Attempt
I drew out the problem and came to the conclusion that since I was working with an inclined plane that the mass of the hockey player didnt matter. I figured out (at least I am pretty sure) that the acceleration is Sin35 * 9.8 = 5.62m/s
Now I just don't know how to figure out the negative acceleration when he hits the snow. Because in order to calculate force friction, I need to know his mass. If someone could help me out it would be much appreaciated! Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Brodo17! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Brodo17 said:
Boom-Boom Slapshot, Canadian hockey star, slides down a 50m long ice covered hill on his skates. The frictionless hill is inclined at 35° to the horizontal. Once he reaches the bottom of the hill, the ice is covered with deep snow that has a coefficient of kinetic friction of .50
How far into the snow will BoomBoom go before coming to rest?

Forget acceleration … the angle is only needed for calculating the height

this is an energy problem …

use conservation of energy on the hill,

and the work-energy theorem ( work done = energy lost ) on the flat :wink:
 
Hi Brodo17

tinytim is right on the money... just thought I would add your acceleration looks correct & you could do it that way, but the looking at the energy will save you a heap of time & effort
 
Thanks guys!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top