How Fast Does Nitrogen Expand to Power Piston Arms?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the expansion rate of nitrogen at various psi levels at room temperature to optimize the velocity of a piston arm. The user seeks to calculate how quickly the piston can move to achieve maximum speeds. There is a suggestion that slower movement with increased force might be more effective for certain applications. The importance of velocity is emphasized, as faster movement can lead to greater propulsion of objects. The conversation concludes without a definitive answer to the original question.
jooster
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i'm trying to figure out the expansion rate of nitrogen at any given psi in room temperature. roughly in fps.

trying to calculate how fast we can move a piston arm to get maximum velocities
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jooster said:
i'm trying to figure out the expansion rate of nitrogen at any given psi in room temperature. roughly in fps.

trying to calculate how fast we can move a piston arm to get maximum velocities

Im not sure on this, but may i ask why the velocity is so important? If you are looking at doing work with this piston it might be easier to simply move it at a slower rate, but with more force. (Heating the nitrogen to a higher temp, using more of it, ETC)

If that makes sense.
 
Drakkith said:
Im not sure on this, but may i ask why the velocity is so important? If you are looking at doing work with this piston it might be easier to simply move it at a slower rate, but with more force. (Heating the nitrogen to a higher temp, using more of it, ETC)

If that makes sense.


the faster the ram moves the higher the velocity can be reached to propel an object
 
jooster said:
the faster the ram moves the higher the velocity can be reached to propel an object

Ah i see. Well, sorry i couldn't help you then. =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top