How Is Kinetic Friction Calculated in Skier's Uphill Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by kinetic friction and the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force for a skier moving uphill. The skier's mass is 64.9 kg, with an initial speed of 8.95 m/s and a final speed of 4.40 m/s after coasting 2.31 m up a 23.4° slope. The equations used include work-energy principles and the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration. Participants identify a potential sign error in their calculations, ultimately confirming the work done by friction as -1390 J. The conversation highlights common mistakes in physics problems, particularly regarding sign conventions.
onyxorca
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 64.9-kg skier coasts up a snow-covered hill that makes an angle of 23.4 ° with the horizontal. The initial speed of the skier is 8.95 m/s. After coasting a distance of 2.31 m up the slope, the speed of the skier is 4.40 m/s. (a) Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force that acts on the skis. (b) What is the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force?

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs2216/art/qb/qu/c06/EAT_12258936060120_435296769488702.gif

Homework Equations



W=FX 2K=mv^2 a=(v^2-v0^2)/2x

The Attempt at a Solution



for (b) i used f=ma-mg sinθ,

or 1/2mv^2-1/2mv0^2-mgxsinθ for (a),

but neither was right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1/2mv^2-1/2mv0^2-mgxsinθ for (a)
looks good to me. What did you get?
 
Delphi51 said:
1/2mv^2-1/2mv0^2-mgxsinθ for (a)
looks good to me. What did you get?

I think there may be a sign error here?

\rm \Delta E = K_f - K_i + U_{f_{grav}}-U_{i_{grav}} = \frac{1}{2}m (v_f^2-v_i^2) +mg s Sin\theta = -1390J
 
Correct! thank you!
 
onyxorca said:
Correct! thank you!

You're welcome. If I had $1 for every time I've made a sign error in my lifetime, well, I'd own beach-front property in South Hampton. :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top