How is Max Power Transferred in a Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Max Power
utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Find the max power transferred through R in the circuit given.


Homework Equations



See attachment for the diagrams

The Attempt at a Solution



The Norton's equivalent resistance is 5.4Ω. For finding the Norton's current, I need to find the short-circuit current through the terminal AB.
Applying Kirchhoff's law to the middle loop, I can write
4(i-2)=1.43(5-i)
i=2.79

Thus, P = Inorton2Req = 42.04.
But this is the incorrect answer.
 

Attachments

  • elec_1.gif
    elec_1.gif
    124 KB · Views: 613
  • elec_2.gif
    elec_2.gif
    103.7 KB · Views: 570
Physics news on Phys.org
The maximum power is transferred to a load equal to the internal resistance of the generator. You calculated the power supplied to the Norton resistance, if there was no load. How much current would flow through the loading resistance R if R=Req?

ehild
 
ehild said:
The maximum power is transferred to a load equal to the internal resistance of the generator. You calculated the power supplied to the Norton resistance, if there was no load. How much current would flow through the loading resistance R if R=Req?

ehild

Thanks! It solved my problem.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top