How Is Shell Structure Evidenced in Atomic Nuclei?

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a) What shows the existence of shell structure? What are the other numbers?

(b) Deduce the spin and parities.

shellstructure1.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The shell model is given by:

shellmodel1.png


So for Li, 3 protons pair up with 3 neutrons, leaving an unpaired neutron in ##1p_{\frac{3}{2}}##. Thus S = 3/2. It's parity is odd.

For Oxygen, 8 protons pair up with 8 neutrons, leaving the unpaired neutron at ##1d_{\frac{5}{2}}##. Thus S = 5/2. Parity is odd.

For Neon, 10 protons pair up with 10 neutrons. it's even-even. Parity is even.

For Aluminium, 13 protons pair up with 13 neutrons, leaving the unpaired neutron is in ##1d_{\frac{5}{2}}##. Thus S = 5/2. Parity is odd.

For Nitrogen, 7 protons pair up with 7 neutrons. No unpaired?

For Potassium, 19 protons pair up with 19 neutrons, leaving unpaired neutron at ##1d_{\frac{3}{2}}##.

For Scandium, 20 protons pair up with 20 neutrons, leaving unpaired proton at ##1f_{\frac{7}{2}}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Protons don't pair up with neutrons, they are different particles. Protons can pair up with protons, and neutrons with neutrons.
 
mfb said:
Protons don't pair up with neutrons, they are different particles. Protons can pair up with protons, and neutrons with neutrons.
OK, I got it. How do you determine the parity then? Say for Oxygen, there is 1 unpaired neutron in 1d(5/2). What is its parity?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top