How Old Is an Exoplanet Based on Potassium Isotope Ratios?

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


An extra solar planet is discovered that is 500 light-years away. It is found through spectroscopic analysis that the abundance of potassium - 40 to potassium - 39 on the planet is 99.9%. Assuming that the planet was created with equal amounts of the two potassium isotopes, how old is the planet?

2. The attempt at a solution
K-39 is stable with 20 neutrons

K-40 half life is 1.277 x 10^7 years

K-40 decays to Ar-40 but that is stable.
Since K-39 and K-40 were in equal proportion to begin with
A_{0} = 0.5
A(t) = 0.01

we can use the half life equation
A(t) = A_{0} \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t/h}
And solving for t=8.48 x 10^7 s [/tex]

But the light from this planet took some time to reach us - 500 light years. But that doesn't make much of a difference

So the answer is 8.48 x 10^7 years or 6.6 half lives.

Am i right? Please advise
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
abundance of potassium - 40 to potassium - 39 on the planet is 99.9%
.

What does the ratio mean in terms of percentage? Please check your data. Do you mean that K40 is 99.9% of the total K?
 
A(t) = .999 not 0.001

because the ratio is K-40/K-39 so there is 999 K-40 for every 1000 K-39

is that correct??
 
stunner5000pt said:
A(t) = .999 not 0.001

because the ratio is K-40/K-39 so there is 999 K-40 for every 1000 K-39

is that correct??

That sounds a bit reasonable. Then you have to find t from:

0.999 = 1*(1/2)^(t/h).
 
Thanks for the help

This question is solved :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top