How Should Gravity Impact Calculations of Speed in Spring Compression Problems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of a block just before it impacts a spring, emphasizing the importance of incorporating gravitational potential energy into the calculations. The initial setup incorrectly assumes that only spring potential energy is at play, neglecting the gravitational energy that contributes to the block's kinetic energy. The block's speed should be calculated by considering both the spring's compression and the gravitational potential energy lost as the block falls. The correct approach involves adjusting the energy equation to account for gravitational effects during spring compression. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurate speed calculations in spring compression problems.
AtlBraves
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with this part of the problem. I set it up like this: -.5*m*v^2 = -.5*k*d^2 so v = sqrt((k*d^2)/m) = sqrt((220*.14^2)/.25) = 4.15 m/s. What am I doing wrong?

A 250 g block is dropped onto a relaxed vertical spring that has a spring constant of k = 2.2 N/cm (Figure 7-42). The block becomes attached to the spring and compresses the spring 14 cm before momentarily stopping.

(c) What is the speed of the block just before it hits the spring? (Assume that friction is negligible.)

07_41.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Possibly, you should take into account the change in gravitational potential energy as well.
 
I don't understand.
 
while the spring is compressing, gravity is still adding kinetic energy, even as the spring is taking it away. so you should see how much gravitational potential energy has been included after the 14 cm compression, and take that into account with your equation
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top