How to Calculate Beta Angle for Pulley B in a Frictional Belt and Pulley System?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the beta angle for pulley B in a frictional belt and pulley system, it is derived from the contact angle of the belt with the pulleys. The calculation involves subtracting the given angle of 60 degrees from 180 degrees, resulting in beta being 120 degrees. This approach assumes that the arcs from both pulleys' circles, represented as blue and yellow arcs, will sum to 360 degrees. The reference point for the angle is crucial, as it shifts from the top of the first pulley to the bottom of the second pulley, maintaining parallelism between the pulleys. Understanding these geometric relationships is essential for accurate calculations in pulley systems.
masterflex
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've attached a picture of the problem. I couldn't get beta=120 degrees, for pulley B. How do you get that. Could the question be mistakenly missing this info in the question?
 

Attachments

  • sample_8.8.JPG
    sample_8.8.JPG
    24.1 KB · Views: 651
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I was thinking about it and drawing circles and lines. Can you tell me if this is a general rule (please look at attachment where I draw circles): when lines are drawn (simulating a rubber band around 2 pulleys), adding blue arcs from both circles will always equal 360 degrees? The blue arc from one circle, and the yellow arc from the other circle are equal in terms of the contact angle, yes?
 

Attachments

  • circle_arc_360.JPG
    circle_arc_360.JPG
    6.4 KB · Views: 614
They get beta = 120 from the given angle of 60 degrees.

180 - 60 = 120 degrees

The 60 degrees is referancing from the top of the pulley. To change the referance point to the bottom of the second pulley they performed the above calculation.

Also, since their referance point is perpendicular to the belt on both pullies they are parallel to each other so the angle referances can then be translated from the larger pulley to the smaller pulley.
 
Last edited:
cool, thx.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top