How to Calculate Radiation Pressure Inside a Kiln?

S_Flaherty
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the electromagnetic radiation inside a kiln, with a volume of 1 m3 and a temperature of 1500 K.

Calculate the radiation pressure inside the kiln. How does it compare with the air pressure?


Homework Equations


PV = NkT


The Attempt at a Solution


I got the total energy using U/V = 8π5(kT)4/15(hc)3 and got U = 3.83 kJ. To find the radiation pressure would I just divide the energy by c? Also, how do I find the air pressure if I don't have a value for N?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radiation pressure is related to the energy density, not total energy. If you don't have a formula at hand, you can calculate the relation pretty easily by using for instance C_v = \frac{\partial U}{\partial T} = T\frac{\partial S}{\partial T} to find entropy. Use that to find the free energy F = U - TS and pressure p = -\frac{\partial F}{\partial V}.
 
clamtrox said:
Radiation pressure is related to the energy density, not total energy. If you don't have a formula at hand, you can calculate the relation pretty easily by using for instance C_v = \frac{\partial U}{\partial T} = T\frac{\partial S}{\partial T} to find entropy. Use that to find the free energy F = U - TS and pressure p = -\frac{\partial F}{\partial V}.

Thanks!, this helps a lot
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top