How to Calculate the Electric Field at the Origin from a Uniformly Charged Rod?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at the origin from a uniformly charged rod, the x and y components of the electric field are derived using integration of the charge density. The equations for E_x and E_y involve integrating the charge element and applying geometric factors based on the rod's position. The computed values for E_x and E_y were found to be 1385 N/C and 1948 N/C, respectively, but there was uncertainty regarding their signs. It was suggested to consider the direction of the electric field produced by a positive point charge to determine the correct signs for the components. Proper evaluation of the signs is essential for accurate results in electric field calculations.
J6204
Messages
56
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A line of charge with a uniform density of 34.2 nC/m lies along the line y = -14.9 cm, between the points with coordinates x = 0 and x = 42.8 cm. Calculate the electric field it creates at the origin, entering first the x component then the y component

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


E_x = 1/(4πε₀) ∫ λ dx * 1/ (Y² + x²) * x/((Y² + x²)^½

where Y is the vertical distance 14.9 cm.
λ dx is the charge element dq, 1/ (Y² + x²) is the " 1/r^2 " and x/((Y² + x²)^½ is the geometric factor for the x-component ("sin(α)" ).

Then the integral gives

E_x = λ/(8πε₀) ∫ du * 1/ u^(3/2)
= λ/(8πε₀) [-2/√u]
= λ/(4πε₀) (1/Y - 1/√(Y² + X²)) [where X = 42.8 cm] Along the same line of reasoning we have for the y-component

E_y = 1/(4πε₀) ∫ λ dx * 1/ (Y² + x²) * Y/((Y² + x²)^½
= Yλ/(4πε₀) ∫ dx /(Y² + x²)^(3/2)
= λ/(4πε₀) X/(Y√(Y² + X²)) When i substituted λ (34.2*10^-9 C/m), X ( 0.428 m ) and Y ( 0.149 m) and ε₀ ( 8.854 10^-12 F/m) to calculate Ex and Ey I got the following two numbers which were incorrect and I am not sure what I am doing wrong

Ex = 1385N/C
Ey = 1948N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J6204 said:
Ex = 1385N/C
Ey = 1948N/C
Your approach looks good. I have not checked the numerical evaluation. But do you expect both components of E to be positive?
 
TSny said:
Your approach looks good. I have not checked the numerical evaluation. But do you expect both components of E to be positive?
I thought so, do the answers look correct besides one or two of them being negative? Did I need to factor in the negative sign on the y coordinate?
 
J6204 said:
I thought so, do the answers look correct besides one or two of them being negative?
Yes. To determine the signs of the components, choose an arbitrary point along the line of charge and treat the point as a positive point charge. Consider the direction of E at the origin produced by the point charge.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top