How to calculate thickness of the wall in a wire chamber

Kyrios
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a question on multiple coulomb scattering in a wire chamber

momentum p = 500MeV/c
wire resolution = 120 microns
distance from wall to wire = 0.01m
radiation length of wall material X_0 = 2E-3 m
mass of charged particle m_{\pi} = 139.6 MeV/c^2
charge z = 1

How thick is the wall if 68% of the particles are scattered less than the wire resolution?

Homework Equations



\theta = \frac{13.6}{\beta p} z \sqrt{\frac{x}{x_0}}

The Attempt at a Solution



What I am trying to find is x, but am uncertain of where exactly the 120 microns and 68% comes in.
I looked up a distribution table and for z=0.68, the area below z = 0.7517. (I think this is what you have to do for 68% scatter less than the resolution?)
The gaussian distribution forms a triangle to work out theta, with the side opposite to the angle. I assume the mean would be zero, so would this side just be 0.7517x120microns?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your attempt.

The formula gives the average deflection angle.

I would first see which angle gives the "maximal" scattering (a deviation by one times the wire resolution within the wire chamber). Then you can find x/x0 to have 68% of the particles below this angle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top