How to Calculate Work Required for Moving a Charge in 2D Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to move a charge in a 2D electric field, start by determining the electric field components from the potential. The work can be expressed as W = ∫F . dl, where F = qE. For integration, it's acceptable to use a parametrization that transitions from infinity to the point (a, b), ensuring the path is continuous and differentiable. The integral should be set up as W = ∫F(ψ(t))*(-1/t^2(a,b))dt, where F(ψ(t)) represents the force at the specified point. This method will yield the total work required for the charge movement.
linda300
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
Hey,

I've been working on this problem, it starts by asking for the potential, then from that the electric field, and finally it asks to calculate the work required to move a charge from infinite to the point it was originally.

It's a 2D problem so the electric field was E = (Ex,Ey) and the location of the particle is at (a, b).

W = ∫F . dl

and F = qE = q (Ex,Ey),

My question is, how do i integrate both x,y in the vector seperately from infinity to a or b?

Do I first do the only the Ex component and set y=b, then to work calculated from that add the work calculated using the Ey component and setting x=a ?

Or use parametrization ψ(x) = 1/t(a,b) 0<t<1 so infinity initially and (a,b) at t=1

then do ∫F(ψ) . -1/t^2(a,b) between 0 and 1,

I'm just unsure if your allowed to have a parametrization like that, which involve infinity since should be continuously differentiable. But in this case I want it to be infinity initially
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and then (a,b) at t=1.Thanks in advance for any help Yes, you can use a parametrization like that, as long as the path from infinity to (a, b) is continuous and differentiable. The integral would be of the form W = ∫F(ψ(t))*(-1/t^2(a,b))dtwhere F(ψ(t)) is the force field at the point (a, b). Integrating with respect to t should give you the total work required.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top